Skip to content

Conversation

@q1blue
Copy link
Collaborator

@q1blue q1blue commented Jan 23, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pnpm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • docs/package.json
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the pnpm-lock.yaml, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-DIFF-14917201
  62  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-DIFF-14917201
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @q1blue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, focuses on improving the project's security by updating a key dependency. The primary objective is to resolve a known vulnerability, thereby enhancing the application's resilience against potential security threats.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The nextra dependency has been upgraded from version 2.0.0-alpha.56 to 3.0.0 in docs/package.json.
  • Security Vulnerability Fix: This upgrade addresses a medium-severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-DIFF-14917201) with a score of 62.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades nextra from 2.0.0-alpha.56 to 3.0.0 to resolve a security vulnerability. While addressing the security issue is important, this is a major version upgrade that introduces significant breaking changes. The current changes are incomplete and will break the documentation site.

Specifically:

  • The pnpm-lock.yaml file was not updated, as noted in the PR description. This must be fixed manually.
  • nextra v3 is a major rewrite that requires several other changes:
    • It requires Next.js 13, but the project is on ~12.2.5.
    • The nextra-theme-docs package is now bundled with nextra and must be removed from dependencies.
    • Configuration files like next.config.js, theme.config.js, and pages/_app.js need to be updated to match the new API of Nextra v3.

Without these additional changes, the project will fail to build. I've added a critical comment in package.json with suggestions.

Comment on lines 17 to 20
"next": "~12.2.5",
"next-themes": "0.2.0",
"nextra": "2.0.0-alpha.56",
"nextra": "3.0.0",
"nextra-theme-docs": "2.2.18",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Upgrading nextra to v3 is a major change with several breaking changes that are not addressed in this PR. This will break the build.

To correctly upgrade to Nextra v3, you need to:

  1. Upgrade next to version 13, as it's a requirement for Nextra v3.
  2. Remove nextra-theme-docs as it's now bundled with nextra.
  3. Update next.config.js, theme.config.js, and pages/_app.js according to the Nextra v3 migration guide.
  4. After making these changes, run pnpm install to update pnpm-lock.yaml.

Here is a suggested update for your dependencies:

Suggested change
"next": "~12.2.5",
"next-themes": "0.2.0",
"nextra": "2.0.0-alpha.56",
"nextra": "3.0.0",
"nextra-theme-docs": "2.2.18",
"next": "^13.0.0",
"next-themes": "0.2.0",
"nextra": "3.0.0",

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants