Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Optimize cache prefix deletion#93

Open
himattm wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/cache-prefix-opt-8466519490052445377
Open

⚡ Bolt: Optimize cache prefix deletion#93
himattm wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/cache-prefix-opt-8466519490052445377

Conversation

@himattm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@himattm himattm commented May 9, 2026

💡 What

Replaced manual string length and slice comparisons in internal/cache/cache.go (len(key) >= len(prefix) && key[:len(prefix)] == prefix) with the standard library's strings.HasPrefix(key, prefix). Added an inline comment explaining the optimization.

🎯 Why

To improve code readability, maintainability, and idiomatic correctness inside a tight loop without sacrificing correctness.

📊 Impact

Produces cleaner, more idiomatic Go code. Although it does not fundamentally alter the Big-O time complexity (since standard library implementations use a similar check underneath), it eliminates manual bounds-checking logic from user space.

🔬 Measurement

All standard go test ./... and go fmt ./... passes. Manual inspection of internal/cache/cache.go reveals the improved logic.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8466519490052445377 started by @himattm

Use `strings.HasPrefix` instead of manual length and string slice checks for iterating over cache keys. This simplifies the condition and improves readability, adhering to Go idioms while maintaining functionality.

Co-authored-by: himattm <6266621+himattm@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the DeleteByPrefix method in the cache implementation to use strings.HasPrefix instead of manual string slicing and adds a corresponding entry to the learning log. Feedback suggests removing a redundant code comment that incorrectly suggests a performance optimization, noting that the change is primarily for idiomatic consistency.

Comment thread internal/cache/cache.go
Comment on lines +102 to +103
// Use strings.HasPrefix for optimized and idiomatic prefix checking
if strings.HasPrefix(key, prefix) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This comment is redundant and slightly misleading. strings.HasPrefix is the idiomatic way to check for prefixes in Go, but its implementation is nearly identical to the manual check previously used, so it does not offer a significant performance optimization. In Go, it is generally preferred to avoid comments that merely describe what the code is doing, especially when using standard library functions.

		if strings.HasPrefix(key, prefix) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant