-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add cotangent-based Laplace-Beltrami and mean curvature support to fv_surface_mesh
#12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Copilot
wants to merge
9
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
copilot/add-cotangent-weights-laplace-beltrami
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
16ca3d4
Initial plan
Copilot e1c0fb5
Plan fv_surface_mesh operators and tests
Copilot 2e3a66f
Add fv_surface_mesh cotangent Laplace-Beltrami and curvature methods
Copilot 472fcf9
Refactor cotangent helper reuse in Laplace-Beltrami implementation
Copilot 83babae
Update tests2/YgorMath/fv_surface_mesh.cc
hdclark bf1dc25
Update src/YgorMath.cc
hdclark cf92b28
Update src/YgorMath.cc
hdclark 297e7ec
Update src/YgorMath.h
hdclark 07be098
Update src/YgorMath.cc
hdclark File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic at line 6330 skips faces with fewer than 3 vertices with 'continue', but then line 6331 throws an error if the face doesn't have exactly 3 vertices. This means faces with exactly 3 vertices are processed, faces with fewer than 3 are skipped silently, but faces with more than 3 vertices throw an error. However, the skip at line 6330 is redundant since faces with size < 3 would fail the size != 3 check at line 6331 anyway. Consider removing line 6330 for clarity, or ensuring faces with < 3 vertices should genuinely be skipped rather than trigger an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove line 6330 as only faces with 3 vertices should be accepted.