Proposed version 1.6.0 with various fixes and a new size limit#19
Proposed version 1.6.0 with various fixes and a new size limit#19unquietwiki wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Not accepting AI-assisted PRs at this time, sorry. |
|
@h3rald Hey, checking in; I was on a break for the past week. Wanted to get your thoughts on how to address outstanding issues going forward. There wasn't an AI policy in place when I submitted this five months ago; conversely, I had kinda forgotten about this, and didn't leverage this for the project I wanted to at the time. |
|
Hi! Well, the claims of that MR would have to be manually verified, and then I would tackle them one by one in separate MRs. Apart from political/environmental/ethical reasons, there may be some useful suggestions in there, I just don't really have the time to review everything together. I may go through it when I get a chance, or feel free to submit separate MRs for each issue. |
|
Understood. I'll try to revisit this on my end as time permits. I barely find time for personal coding these days... |
CHANGES.md
I've been leveraging Claude Code as an advanced source-code linter & code review assistant for various projects. I hadn't touched this in a while, and wanted to see what it might say about it: basically, the program mostly works, but had a few minor issues + a potential vulnerability, that it has tried to fix. The changes are summarized in the attached Markdown file: I had to make a few tweaks, but the overall process was pretty solid.
I suppose if there are any improvements left to be made, would be to see if it's possible to do multi-part streaming of files. That would obviate the need for a memory limit on files.