Improve filterby #228
Improve filterby #228
Conversation
jpserra
force-pushed
the
improve-filterby
branch
8 times, most recently
from
aedda97 to
2cfcbe6
Compare
|
Having troubled working out the input box for multiple |
jpserra
force-pushed
the
improve-filterby
branch
5 times, most recently
from
38045b8 to
edcbe8e
Compare
|
This is working properly for programatically set filters (i.e. |
|
I actually would rather not have the input box parsing here |
|
@glittershark Meaning only programmatically you would be able to achieve this, but keep the input working as is, filtering for all the filterable columns? |
|
yes. |
|
How would you represent the search box upon first render of the table, with |
|
ah, right, didn't think about that. This feature-set can stay as-is then |
|
I'm just gonna rebase it with a small cleanup, let me know what you think afterwards 😉 |
jpserra
force-pushed
the
improve-filterby
branch
4 times, most recently
from
7ecfa5e to
3a2fad1
Compare
|
Will be waiting for your feedback and suggestion of improvement here, Thank you in advance for taking the time to look into my PR. cheers |
This Branch improves the way filterBy workes, by allowing it to be
set with and hash like {'Column': 'search query'} programatically.
Another improvement, that still needs to be touched is the ability to do
the same from the search box in a form of 'Column: search query' that will be
split by the ':' and use each side as column to filter, and value.
jpserra
force-pushed
the
improve-filterby
branch
from
3a2fad1 to
eba3c42
Compare
|
This one is way overdue.. what is @glittershark doing? |
3 participants
Closes #183