Make blocked user info more consice#40367
Conversation
|
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
How to review these changes 👓Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options: A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review. Table of review linksNote: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace. The table shows the files in the
Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server 🤖 This comment is automatically generated. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
|
@SollyBunny Thanks for opening a PR! I'm afraid, though, that you're sacrificing clarity for being concise, and that is absolutely not what we want to do in any documentation about safety. Clarity is the top priority. We're not going to accept this PR, but we do have a help wanted tag in the issues if you're looking to make a contribution. A lot of articles beginning with "about" (About projects, for example) could also be much more concise, if that's the kind of editing you're specifically looking to do. ✨ |
The issue for this would be the same as the PR and take longer
Combined
you no longer x's on usersandusers on longer x's on ainto one phrase usingeachother. This happens to contribution counting and colaborator status. I then put these next to eachother.I'm not sure if I can use
collaborator statussince it's not used elsewhere, it would make it easier to read in my opion rather thanYou are removed as collaborators fromI am also not sure if I can change
counted as contributionsto justcounted, I initally wanted to change it tocounted on eachothers' profilessince I wasn't aware of anywhere else contributions were countedCheck off the following:
- [ ] All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.Wording change