Update create-custom-protection-rules.md#39863
Update create-custom-protection-rules.md#39863MikeGBurns wants to merge 2 commits intogithub:mainfrom
Conversation
Additional details and corrections on approving or rejecting a deployment request.
|
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates documentation for custom protection rules in GitHub Actions deployments, specifically improving the instructions for approving or rejecting deployment requests. The changes provide additional technical details and correct formatting inconsistencies.
Key changes:
- Corrects API endpoint casing in the access token URL
- Enhances the deployment approval/rejection step with more comprehensive implementation details
- Improves clarity on required parameters and expected responses
...nt/actions/how-tos/deploy/configure-and-manage-deployments/create-custom-protection-rules.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
How to review these changes 👓Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options: A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review. Table of review linksNote: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace. The table shows the files in the
Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server 🤖 This comment is automatically generated. |
…s/create-custom-protection-rules.md Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@MikeGBurns Thanks for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review. |
|
A stale label has been added to this pull request because it has been open 30 days with no activity. If you think this pull request should remain open, please add a new comment. |
|
A stale label has been added to this pull request because it has been open 30 days with no activity. If you think this pull request should remain open, please add a new comment. |
|
@MikeGBurns I've talked to the Actions team about this a few times, and after looking into it, they've decided they don't want to add this explanation. I wish I had a fuller explanation for you, but I didn't get one. I'm going to have to close this PR, I'm sorry. |
Additional details and corrections on approving or rejecting a deployment request.
Why:
Closes:
What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
Check off the following: