Skip to content

Fix Xquik MCP docs link 🤖🤖🤖#2001

Open
kriptoburak wants to merge 1 commit into
github:stagedfrom
kriptoburak:codex/update-xquik-mcp-doc-link
Open

Fix Xquik MCP docs link 🤖🤖🤖#2001
kriptoburak wants to merge 1 commit into
github:stagedfrom
kriptoburak:codex/update-xquik-mcp-doc-link

Conversation

@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Update the Xquik skill MCP docs link to the current overview URL.
  • Leave generated skill indexes unchanged.

Validation

  • npm run skill:validate
  • npm run build
  • git diff --check
  • Link checks: current MCP overview, API overview, SDK index, OpenAPI spec, and skill repo returned 200.

Note: npm ci completed and reported existing audit findings in target dependencies. This PR does not change dependencies.

@kriptoburak kriptoburak requested a review from aaronpowell as a code owner June 15, 2026 08:55
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the skills PR touches skills label Jun 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 1 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 0
🟠 Medium 0
ℹ️ Info 0

✅ No matching risk patterns were detected in changed files.

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the skill-check-warning Skill validator reported warnings label Jun 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Skill Validator Results

⚠️ Warnings or advisories found

Scope Checked
Skills 1
Agents 0
Total 1
Severity Count
❌ Errors 0
⚠️ Warnings 1
ℹ️ Advisories 0

Summary

Level Finding
ℹ️ Found 1 skill(s)
ℹ️ [x-twitter-scraper] 📊 x-twitter-scraper: 836 BPE tokens [chars/4: 995] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks
ℹ️ [x-twitter-scraper] ⚠ No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands.
ℹ️ ✅ All checks passed (1 skill(s))
Full validator output
Found 1 skill(s)
[x-twitter-scraper] 📊 x-twitter-scraper: 836 BPE tokens [chars/4: 995] (detailed ✓), 8 sections, 0 code blocks
[x-twitter-scraper]    ⚠  No code blocks — agents perform better with concrete snippets and commands.
✅ All checks passed (1 skill(s))

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔴 Contributor Reputation Check: HIGH risk

Check Risk
Profile HIGH
Credential audit NONE

Maintainers: please review this contributor before merging.
See the workflow run for full details.
Automated check powered by AGT.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk label Jun 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk skill-check-warning Skill validator reported warnings skills PR touches skills

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant