Skip to content

Rename package to geo-utils-cpp (repology name conflict)#11

Merged
gistrec merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
rename-geo-utils-cpp
May 7, 2026
Merged

Rename package to geo-utils-cpp (repology name conflict)#11
gistrec merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
rename-geo-utils-cpp

Conversation

@gistrec
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@gistrec gistrec commented May 7, 2026

The name geo-utils on repology already refers to another component, so the distribution package name had to change. Renames cover pkg-config, CPack, CMake find_package (GeoUtilsCpp) and the GEO_UTILS_CPP_* option prefix. The public C++ API — target geo::utils, namespace geo::, headers <geo/...> — is unchanged. Bump to 1.0.1.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.18%. Comparing base (70e0f49) to head (7d02e8b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #11   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.18%   98.18%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         497      497           
  Branches       88       88           
=======================================
  Hits          488      488           
  Misses          1        1           
  Partials        8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gistrec gistrec requested a review from MrHerrn May 7, 2026 18:28
@gistrec gistrec self-assigned this May 7, 2026
Comment thread cmake/geo-utils-cpp.pc.in
Comment thread cmake/geo-utils-cpp.pc.in Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants