-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
fix: FP8 fallback for AIU addons running on CPU #200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
andrea-fasoli
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fp8_cpu
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
96e3284
add fallback to mock fp8 matmul on cpu
andrea-fasoli 84d0ac0
formatting
andrea-fasoli 23b10a3
fix dtype of fp8 matmul with non-quantized activations
andrea-fasoli 8a046a9
add torchao version check in fallback
andrea-fasoli c0a617f
add unit tests for FP8 matmul on CPU
andrea-fasoli c283291
minor updates
andrea-fasoli e158bd2
minor updates
andrea-fasoli ef73576
remove static activation test
andrea-fasoli bc5de3e
fix pylint false positive
andrea-fasoli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we expect this to affect the quality significantly ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If anything it'll improve it on cpu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sense. Since we use these numbers to compare against accelerator results, this can cause wider deviation between those results? Unless the diff is quite small.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we're downcasting back to fp8 anyways, so it shouldn't be too different.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also expect a very minimal discrepancy in terms of generation compared to the earlier operation.
There may be some runtime overhead, as this new fallback is likely less performant than calling
torch._scaled_mm. To clarify: potential overheads on CPU validation only, no impact at all on AIU runtime.