Skip to content

Conversation

@sahdev77
Copy link
Contributor

@sahdev77 sahdev77 commented Dec 22, 2025

Description here... Help the reviewer by:

Checklist (if applicable):

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sahdev77, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important consistency issue within the prompt definitions. It updates the role syntax in a sample multi-message prompt file, replacing an older templating style with a newer, standardized format. This ensures that all prompt definitions adhere to a uniform syntax, improving readability and maintainability for developers working with these prompts.

Highlights

  • Prompt Syntax Update: The syntax for defining roles (system and user) within the multi-msg.prompt sample file has been updated to ensure consistency with the new <<<dotprompt:role:...>>> format.
  • Consistency Improvement: This change standardizes the prompt role definition, moving from the older {{ role "..." }} syntax to the more current <<<dotprompt:role:...>>> syntax.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the go label Dec 22, 2025
@sahdev77 sahdev77 requested a review from apascal07 December 22, 2025 17:00
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the role syntax in go/samples/prompts/prompts/multi-msg.prompt to the <<<dotprompt:role:...>>> format for consistency. The change is correct and improves standardization. However, I've identified that TestMultiMessagesPrompt in go/ai/prompt_test.go still utilizes the old {{ role "..." }} syntax. I recommend updating this test to use the new syntax to ensure complete test coverage and maintain consistency across the codebase. It would also be valuable to verify if other samples and tests in the repository, including those for other languages, need a similar update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant