💣 feat: play nice with PolyfillLib #131
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This introduces a breaking change that moves the
Check.Contains(string, string, System.StringComparison)extension method into the Light.GuardClauses.FrameworkExtensions namespace and a newStringExtensionsclass so it is no longer automatically imported with the top-level Light.GuardClauses namespace.The reason for doing this is that not doing so conflicts with other polyfill libraries, such as Polyfill.
Basically any file that includes both namespaces and calls string.Contains(string, System.StringComparison) will fail to build in .NET Framework targets with error CS0121.
Moving it to the FrameworkExtensions namespace allows it to not only continue to be used by Light.GuardClauses itself (both in package and source references), but also continues to expose the extension method in some way for callers looking for just this polyfill and not a larger suite of polyfills such as PolyfillLib.