Skip to content

Add support for communicating with CDJ-3000#27

Open
ChatoDeVeirman wants to merge 1 commit intoevanpurkhiser:mainfrom
ChatoDeVeirman:main
Open

Add support for communicating with CDJ-3000#27
ChatoDeVeirman wants to merge 1 commit intoevanpurkhiser:mainfrom
ChatoDeVeirman:main

Conversation

@ChatoDeVeirman
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Communication with a CDJ-3000 is different, see https://djl-analysis.deepsymmetry.org/djl-analysis/startup.html#startup-3000

This PR introduces the needed changes for this different communication while allowing backwards-compatibility.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prolink-connect ❌ Failed (Inspect) Oct 8, 2024 1:09pm

@evanpurkhiser
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Does anything break if it’s just always set?

@ChatoDeVeirman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Does anything break if it’s just always set?

I have tested it with a CDJ-3000 and works perfectly. I wasn't able to test it with other CDJs or other setups since I don't have access to them but normally everything should work fine.

@evanpurkhiser
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I’ll ask around in the dysentery Zulip. I might not be able to get to this for a week or so. Got a lot going on IRL right now!

thanks again for opening this PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants