Skip to content

Add support of portal loop lookups when they are nested >1 level in s…#3105

Merged
MSt1ch merged 2 commits into
epam:developfrom
siarheiy:feat/nested-shadow-root-support
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

Add support of portal loop lookups when they are nested >1 level in s…#3105
MSt1ch merged 2 commits into
epam:developfrom
siarheiy:feat/nested-shadow-root-support

Conversation

@siarheiy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…hadow dom hierarchy. the idea:

  1. Existing data attr. is used for backwards compatibility: [data-shadow-host-id] 2) When same shadow DOM contains more than 1 portal root - the value of this attr. contain all the IDs separated by comma. 3) When portal root is nested under the hierarchy of shadow roots - the ID of this portal is added to all relevant nodes in this hierarchy. They are properly cleaned up when the portal root is destroyed.

Description:

Issue link:

QA notes:

…hadow dom hierarchy. the idea:

1) Existing data attr. is used for backwards compatibility: [data-shadow-host-id]
2) When same shadow DOM contains more than 1 portal root - the value of this attr. contain all the IDs separated by comma.
3) When portal root is nested under the hierarchy of shadow roots - the ID of this portal is added to all relevant nodes in this hierarchy.
They are properly cleaned up when the portal root is destroyed.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Generated by: track-bundle-size
Generated at: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:36:07 GMT
Bundle size diff (in kBytes). Not gzipped. Both CSS & JS included.
Baseline: v6.3.1 (2025-12-03)
CI Status: ok

Module Baseline Size
(v6.3.1)
Size Diff Within
Threshold
Threshold
(min - max)
templateApp 693.09 705.55 +12.47
js:+5.29
css:+7.18
🆗 623.78 - 762.39
@epam/app 5586.96 5537.34 -49.61
js:-55.25
css:+5.64
🆗 5028.26 - 6145.65
@epam/electric 5.04 5.04 0
js:0
css:0
🆗 4.53 - 5.54
@epam/promo 55.61 55.57 -0.05
js:0
css:-0.05
🆗 50.05 - 61.17
@epam/uui-extra 0.21 0.21 0
js:0
css:0
🆗 0.19 - 0.23
@epam/loveship 92.81 96.25 +3.44
js:+3.48
css:-0.04
🆗 83.53 - 102.09
@epam/uui-components 257.49 263.04 +5.54
js:+4.03
css:+1.51
🆗 231.75 - 283.25
@epam/uui-core 324.75 330.13 +5.38
js:+5.38
css:0
🆗 292.27 - 357.23
@epam/uui-db 41.63 41.72 +0.08
js:+0.08
css:0
🆗 37.47 - 45.8
@epam/uui-docs 181.03 194.75 +13.72
js:+13.72
css:+0.01
🆗 162.92 - 199.13
@epam/uui-editor 174.1 173.26 -0.84
js:-0.83
css:-0.01
🆗 156.69 - 191.51
@epam/uui-timeline 75.5 75.49 -0.01
js:0
css:0
🆗 67.95 - 83.05
@epam/uui 527.51 561.06 +33.55
js:+10.74
css:+22.81
🆗 474.76 - 580.26
new sizes (raw)

To set the sizes as a new baseline, you can copy/paste next content to the uui-build/config/bundleSizeBaseLine.json and commit the file.

{
  "version": "6.5.0",
  "timestamp": "2026-06-11",
  "sizes": {
    "templateApp": {
      "css": 264820,
      "js": 457665
    },
    "@epam/app": {
      "css": 726287,
      "js": 4943952
    },
    "@epam/electric": {
      "css": 2275,
      "js": 2883
    },
    "@epam/promo": {
      "css": 47756,
      "js": 9145
    },
    "@epam/uui-extra": {
      "css": 0,
      "js": 213
    },
    "@epam/loveship": {
      "css": 55336,
      "js": 43226
    },
    "@epam/uui-components": {
      "css": 25145,
      "js": 244200
    },
    "@epam/uui-core": {
      "css": 0,
      "js": 338056
    },
    "@epam/uui-db": {
      "css": 0,
      "js": 42718
    },
    "@epam/uui-docs": {
      "css": 2162,
      "js": 197259
    },
    "@epam/uui-editor": {
      "css": 12944,
      "js": 164475
    },
    "@epam/uui-timeline": {
      "css": 2199,
      "js": 75104
    },
    "@epam/uui": {
      "css": 222096,
      "js": 352428
    }
  }
}

Generated by: generate-components-api
CI Status: ok

Total amount of exported types/props without JSDoc comments

Amount
Types 341 (+0) 🆗
Props 220 (+0) 🆗

@MSt1ch MSt1ch merged commit a57ca9c into epam:develop Jun 11, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants