docs(audits): re-audit IDSD with full article content#118
Merged
Conversation
User pasted the full article (~3000 words) shortly after the initial
paywall-limited audit. Re-ran the audit against the actual IDSD method
definition.
New verdict: ⚙️ Parallel methodology with complementary scope.
IDSD = Intent-Driven Software Development, built on ICE framework
(Intent, Context, Expectations). Article fully defines Intent's 5 parts:
description, constraints, failure scenarios, success scenarios,
connections. Expectations + Context are flagged for future pieces.
Scope comparison:
- IDSD = per-feature loop (Intent + Expectations + Context as 3 crafts)
- Encoding loop = cross-feature compounding (5 surfaces + enforcement
spectrum + "next session smarter")
They're complementary, not competitive.
Five borrowable framings identified:
1. "Connections" requirement in /feature-spec (traceability gap)
2. Hole-test ("hand it to someone not in your head")
3. "Presence in the loop, not approval at the gate" discipline
4. "Method vs harness" distinction made explicit
5. Academic grounding citations (Larman/Basili 2003, Ostroff/Makalsky/
Paige 2004 XP, METR 2025 trial, OpenAI Symphony case study)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
|
PR changed again? Review this PR in Change Stack to compare snapshots and stay oriented. Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe PR updates an article audit log entry in ChangesIDSD Methodology Audit Entry
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Initial verdict was paywall-limited ("unauditable"). User pasted full article; re-audited. New verdict: ⚙️ parallel methodology with complementary scope. Five borrowable framings identified for the encoding loop method.
Summary by CodeRabbit