Add function to decode the contetns of a JSON string with another decoder#35
Open
kintrix007 wants to merge 1 commit intoelm:masterfrom
Open
Add function to decode the contetns of a JSON string with another decoder#35kintrix007 wants to merge 1 commit intoelm:masterfrom
kintrix007 wants to merge 1 commit intoelm:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #33
Maybe it would be worth discussing the exact API to publish.
I personally think it is fine to add a function like
stringAs : Decoder a -> Decoder ato the public API, I can see how it is rare to want to decode the string as anything but an integer or a float.Because of that it might be a better idea to expose functions
stringAsInt : Decoder IntandstringAsFloat : Decoder Floatinstead. Maybe alongside a genericstringAs, to support weird use-cases?