Skip to content

Conversation

@shmuelarditi
Copy link
Contributor

@shmuelarditi shmuelarditi commented Jul 30, 2025

✨ PR Description

Purpose: Simplify the auto-dispatch workflow by removing dynamic versioning based on PR labels and hardcoding patch level.

Main changes:

  • Simplified conditional logic for determining when to run the workflow
  • Removed multi-step versioning logic that extracted labels from PRs
  • Hardcoded "patch" as the default version level for all releases
  • Added empty lines to the end of README.md

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We'd love your feedback! 🚀

@shmuelarditi shmuelarditi merged commit 7334872 into master Jul 30, 2025
6 checks passed
Copy link

@gitstream-cm gitstream-cm bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✨ PR Review

The PR simplifies the workflow by removing dynamic version level determination and hardcoding all releases as patch level. This represents a significant functional change that may impact semantic versioning.

2 issues detected:

🐞 Bug - Dynamic version level determination based on PR labels has been replaced with hardcoded "patch" level

Details: The workflow previously determined release levels (major/minor/patch) based on PR labels, but now hardcodes all releases as patch level. This removes the ability to create major or minor releases through PR labeling, potentially breaking semantic versioning practices and downstream automation that depends on proper version levels.
File: .github/workflows/auto-dispatch.yaml (22-22)

🐞 Bug - Removed explicit event type check makes the condition less precise and potentially error-prone

Details: The workflow condition logic has been simplified by removing the explicit check for pull_request event type in the merged PR condition. While this may not cause issues given the current trigger configuration, it makes the condition less precise and could lead to unexpected behavior if workflow triggers are modified in the future.
File: .github/workflows/auto-dispatch.yaml (11-11)

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We'd love your feedback! 🚀

{
"level": "${{ steps.level.outputs.level }}",
"level": "patch",
"source": "${{ github.event_name }}",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐞 Bug - Semantic Versioning Lost: Restore the dynamic version level determination logic or implement an alternative mechanism to specify release levels based on PR labels or other criteria.

Suggested change
"level": "patch",
"level": "${{ github.event.pull_request.merged == true && contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'major') && 'major' || github.event.pull_request.merged == true && contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'minor') && 'minor' || 'patch' }}",

jobs:
release-dispatch:
if: (github.event_name == 'push') || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.merged == true && github.base_ref == 'master')
if: github.event_name == 'push' || (github.event.pull_request.merged == true && github.base_ref == 'master')
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐞 Bug - Condition Logic Change: Keep the explicit event type check in the condition: github.event_name == 'push' || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.merged == true && github.base_ref == 'master')

Suggested change
if: github.event_name == 'push' || (github.event.pull_request.merged == true && github.base_ref == 'master')
if: github.event_name == 'push' || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.merged == true && github.base_ref == 'master')

@rami-elementor rami-elementor deleted the shmuelarditi-patch-1 branch July 31, 2025 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant