[Workflows] Introductory material and foundational concepts#4713
Conversation
Vale Linting ResultsSummary: 3 suggestions found 💡 Suggestions (3)
The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
|
@nastasha-solomon In the Pre-requisites section, we should add a note on RBAC. They will need to appropriate permissions to leverage workflows. |
vishaangelova
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is great stuff! The structure is flowing well, and the content is easy to understand! ✨
I left some comments and suggestions for your consideration — feel free to accept or ignore as you see fit :)
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Visha Angelova <91186315+vishaangelova@users.noreply.github.com>
| name: { type: text } | ||
| category: { type: keyword } | ||
| description: { type: text } | ||
| - name: bulk_index_park_data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jamesspi @tinnytintin10 wondering if this step needs to be updated as per the recommendation here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I left a note to @talboren that it's not typical that we would backport a breaking change in a patch release. I would say leave as is for 9.3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is elastic/workflows#3 fixing this issue for 9.3.1? If so, would we need to update the examples as per what's described in elastic/workflows#2?
|
Additional changes to this content can be made in #4758. |
Summary
Fixes #4650: Adds introductory material, including an overview of workflows and a tutorial for getting started.
Previews
To find these pages in the left nav, go to Elastic Docs > Explore and analyze > Workflows
NOTE:
Generative AI disclosure
Tool(s) and model(s) used:
Cursor, claude-4.5-opus-high