[9.2](backport #48499) mod: update github.com/elastic/mito to v1.22.1#48526
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Cherry-pick of c17c95d has failed: To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally |
Contributor
🤖 GitHub commentsJust comment with:
|
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations) |
This picks up elastic/mito@f9b0830 which fixes rate period scaling. ref: elastic/mito#119 (cherry picked from commit c17c95d)
d1c5d83 to
4eed50b
Compare
Contributor
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
andrewkroh
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2026
5 tasks
brijesh-elastic
added a commit
to elastic/integrations
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2026
The httpjson input's limitPolicy function in mito incorrectly scaled the rate period by the window duration, producing a rate in s^-2 instead of s^-1. This made rate limiting far more restrictive than the server's headers indicated for any window > 1s. The fix landed in mito v1.22.1, v1.23.1, and v1.24.1, which were picked up in beats v8.19.11 (elastic/beats#48500) and v9.2.5 (elastic/beats#48526). Bump the Kibana version constraint to match. ref: elastic/mito#119
ilyannn
pushed a commit
to elastic/integrations
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2026
The httpjson input's limitPolicy function in mito incorrectly scaled the rate period by the window duration, producing a rate in s^-2 instead of s^-1. This made rate limiting far more restrictive than the server's headers indicated for any window > 1s. The fix landed in mito v1.22.1, v1.23.1, and v1.24.1, which were picked up in beats v8.19.11 (elastic/beats#48500) and v9.2.5 (elastic/beats#48526). Bump the Kibana version constraint to match. ref: elastic/mito#119
navnit-elastic
pushed a commit
to navnit-elastic/integrations
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2026
…tic#17564) The httpjson input's limitPolicy function in mito incorrectly scaled the rate period by the window duration, producing a rate in s^-2 instead of s^-1. This made rate limiting far more restrictive than the server's headers indicated for any window > 1s. The fix landed in mito v1.22.1, v1.23.1, and v1.24.1, which were picked up in beats v8.19.11 (elastic/beats#48500) and v9.2.5 (elastic/beats#48526). Bump the Kibana version constraint to match. ref: elastic/mito#119
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed commit message
Note
The backport to 8.19 will be constructed manually: #48500
Checklist
stresstest.shscript to run them under stress conditions and race detector to verify their stability../changelog/fragmentsusing the changelog tool.Disruptive User Impact
Author's Checklist
How to test this PR locally
Related issues
Use cases
Screenshots
Logs
This is an automatic backport of pull request #48499 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).