Skip to content

Conversation

@qor-lb
Copy link
Contributor

@qor-lb qor-lb commented Feb 7, 2026

Formal decision record based on discussion during last architecture community workshop: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/1922#discussioncomment-14871055

This intends to establish a discussion basis for further technical dr's such as:

Important

This PR will be kept open at least until 13th Feb before merging to ensure that necessary reviews can be conducted.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

masc2023 commented Feb 8, 2026

Seems related to #2346, Feature as stand-alone Delivery?

@qor-lb
Copy link
Contributor Author

qor-lb commented Feb 8, 2026

Seems related to #2346, Feature as stand-alone Delivery?

Yes agree, added it to the list in the description above.

PandaeDo
PandaeDo previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@PandaeDo PandaeDo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@opajonk opajonk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is the same, at least from the discussion in the last architecture on-site where I was also participating.

(Cross-linking another related DR: #2400)

Copy link
Contributor

@FScholPer FScholPer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What option is accepted or did I miss something?

Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see inline comment

- Specify CI/CD implementations or quality gates.
- Define release cadences or versioning strategies.
- Provide a migration plan for existing modules.
- Specify how architectural discussions are conducted or moderated.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please include something like: "This approach does not prevent the use-case of independent module (or feature) delivery. I.e. the modules/features are still independent enough to be able to be released as a SEooC.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aschemmel-tech I added a paragraph to clarify that it is not the goal to constrain the modularity of the stack. Does this suffice or would you like to have the wording differently?

Copy link
Contributor

@FScholPer FScholPer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no accepted option defined

@qor-lb
Copy link
Contributor Author

qor-lb commented Feb 12, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants