-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
Open SOME/IP spec references added. #2525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ data or to subscribe to data. As such it will need to know and understand the da | |
| the IPC network. | ||
|
|
||
| It also is a participant in the SOME/IP network and provides services for the service oriented communication. | ||
| This shall be possible by including the `vsomeip <https://github.com/COVESA/vsomeip>`_ SOME/IP stack for reference, | ||
| which can be replaced by other implementations, i.e. proprietary commercial stacks. | ||
| This functionality is enabled through the inclusion of the `vsomeip <https://github.com/COVESA/vsomeip>`_ stack, | ||
| which is based on the publicly released `Open SOME/IP <https://github.com/some-ip-com/open-someip-spec>`_ Specification | ||
| and serves as a reference implementation that may be substituted with alternative solutions, including proprietary | ||
| commercial SOME/IP stacks. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we should remove that sentence as this is not in scope for S-CORE
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do you really mean the entire sentence? (Incl. the vsomeip based plugin?) |
||
|
|
||
| There need to be some components between the two communication networks as data types and their according representations and | ||
| transmission cadence can be different. Translation of data types could be handled in some translation module | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -39,17 +39,17 @@ Functional Requirements | |
|
|
||
| The SOME/IP Gateway shall support an interface to plug-in a E2E protection service implementation. | ||
|
|
||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_ Protocol Specification | ||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with Open SOME/IP Protocol Specification | ||
| :id: feat_req__some_ip_gateway__someip_protocol | ||
| :reqtype: Functional | ||
| :security: NO | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :satisfies: stkh_req__communication__supported_net | ||
| :status: valid | ||
|
|
||
| The SOME/IP protocol implementation shall be fully compatible and complying with the SOME/IP protocol specification from `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_. | ||
| The SOME/IP protocol implementation shall be fully compatible and complying with the SOME/IP protocol specification from `Open SOME/IP <https://github.com/some-ip-com/open-someip-spec>`_. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this the case for vsomeip at the moment?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would say so: |
||
|
|
||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_ E2E Protocol Specification | ||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with some-ip.com E2E Protocol Specification | ||
| :id: feat_req__some_ip_gateway__e2e_specs | ||
| :reqtype: Functional | ||
| :security: NO | ||
|
|
@@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ Functional Requirements | |
|
|
||
| The E2E protection implementation shall be fully compatible and complying with the E2E protocol specification from `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_. | ||
|
|
||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_ SOME/IP Service Discovery Protocol Specification | ||
| .. feat_req:: Compatibility with Open SOME/IP Service Discovery Protocol Specification | ||
| :id: feat_req__some_ip_gateway__someip_sd_protocol | ||
| :reqtype: Functional | ||
| :security: NO | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :satisfies: stkh_req__communication__supported_net | ||
| :status: valid | ||
|
|
||
| The Service Discovery implementation shall be fully compatible and complying with the SOME/IP service discovery specification from `some-ip.com <https://some-ip.com/>`_. | ||
| The Service Discovery implementation shall be fully compatible and complying with the SOME/IP service discovery specification from `Open SOME/IP <https://github.com/some-ip-com/open-someip-spec>`_. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would make sense to pick a release here which can be later on updated: https://github.com/some-ip-com/open-someip-spec/tree/release-2025-12
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dasoho any updates?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was not available last week, will provide an update by Feb. 11th.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do the update and reference the current release.