Skip to content

Conversation

@arkjedrz
Copy link
Contributor

Use testing_utils with explicit config param.

@arkjedrz arkjedrz requested a review from PiotrKorkus February 12, 2026 07:24
@arkjedrz arkjedrz self-assigned this Feb 12, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2026

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 1edc88e9-f89c-42b5-8b10-1c0a781fe0e4
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
WARNING: For repository 'rules_python', the root module requires module version rules_python@1.4.1, but got rules_python@1.8.3 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'rules_cc', the root module requires module version rules_cc@0.1.2, but got rules_cc@0.2.14 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'score_process', the root module requires module version score_process@1.4.0, but got score_process@1.4.3 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 2 packages loaded
Loading: 2 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 2 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (3 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (3 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (75 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (90 packages loaded, 18 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (149 packages loaded, 2150 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (154 packages loaded, 2259 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (159 packages loaded, 2308 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (161 packages loaded, 2478 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (165 packages loaded, 5418 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (166 packages loaded, 5426 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 5595 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (193 packages loaded, 5638 targets configured)
[12 / 17] [Prepa] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes ... (2 actions, 0 running)
INFO: From Generating Dash formatted dependency file ...:
INFO: Successfully converted 62 packages from Cargo.lock to bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/formatted.txt
Analyzing: target //:license-check (193 packages loaded, 5638 targets configured)
[14 / 17] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
Analyzing: target //:license-check (193 packages loaded, 5638 targets configured)
[15 / 17] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
Analyzing: target //:license-check (193 packages loaded, 5638 targets configured)
[16 / 17] [Prepa] Building license.check.license_check.jar ()
Analyzing: target //:license-check (193 packages loaded, 5638 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
Analyzing: target //:license-check (194 packages loaded, 9972 targets configured)
[17 / 17] no actions running
INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (196 packages loaded, 10086 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 41.935s, Critical Path: 4.41s
INFO: 17 processes: 12 internal, 4 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 17 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@arkjedrz arkjedrz force-pushed the arkjedrz_cit-fix-config branch from 7102406 to 1c0ead7 Compare February 12, 2026 09:25
@arkjedrz arkjedrz force-pushed the arkjedrz_cit-fix-config branch from 1c0ead7 to 0ef6438 Compare February 12, 2026 09:34
@PiotrKorkus
Copy link
Contributor

@arkjedrz could you rebase your branch on eclipse/main? Im not sure what will happen in current state of this PR with those merge commits from qorix fork

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Use `testing_utils` with explicit `config` param.
@arkjedrz arkjedrz force-pushed the arkjedrz_cit-fix-config branch from 0ef6438 to 51aafc4 Compare February 12, 2026 09:49
@vinodreddy-g vinodreddy-g merged commit e135278 into eclipse-score:main Feb 12, 2026
17 checks passed
@arkjedrz arkjedrz deleted the arkjedrz_cit-fix-config branch February 12, 2026 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants