Skip to content

Conversation

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

@pahmann pahmann commented Dec 16, 2025

While the test type name the right type the actual type name does not follow the process_description and platform management plan guideline. This PR fixes the terminology.

Resolves: #63

Resolves: #63
Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
Fixes: #63
Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@pahmann pahmann requested a review from PiotrKorkus December 17, 2025 09:48
@pahmann
Copy link
Member Author

pahmann commented Jan 9, 2026

@castler, @hoe-jo, @LittleHuba, @ramceb, @nradakovic, @4og
anyone willing to take a look at this PR?
This was issued to make baselibs a bit more process compliant.

@4og
Copy link
Member

4og commented Jan 15, 2026

Hi @pahmann, this PR is affecting the same files as in #66. See my response there: #66 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Baselibs TestType does not match naming convention of PMP verification plan

3 participants