Skip to content

Arm64: [PAC-RET] Add Pointer Authentication support for Arm64#125436

Open
SwapnilGaikwad wants to merge 116 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
SwapnilGaikwad:github-add-pac
Open

Arm64: [PAC-RET] Add Pointer Authentication support for Arm64#125436
SwapnilGaikwad wants to merge 116 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
SwapnilGaikwad:github-add-pac

Conversation

@SwapnilGaikwad
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@SwapnilGaikwad SwapnilGaikwad commented Mar 11, 2026

This PR adds support for Pointer Authentication (PAC) on Arm64. Pointer Authentication (PAC) is an Armv8.3+ security feature designed to mitigate Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) attacks by cryptographically signing return addresses. While using PAC, we store a signed return address, instead of the plain address, on the stack and later authenticate it before returning from a function. It ensures control flow returns to the intended caller.

More details on PAC and its role in software security can be found (here).

  • The current implementation of PAC is turned off by default, but can be turned on by setting DOTNET_JitPacEnabled=1.
  • PAC protects link register (LR) by signing it in the prolog (using paciasp) before it is split, using the current SP as the modifier. It then authenticates the LR in the epilog (using autiasp) before the function returns. If the signature is invalid, the execution fails with SIGILL.
  • When the runtime needs to read or overwrite a return address during hijacking for GC, it now strips the PAC (using xpaclri) and re-signs the new target address before storing it back.

ToDos

  • Disable PAC by default before merge.
  • Restore the original frame layout that used pre-indexed variant of stp to store FP/LR.
  • Authenticate the return address instead of stripping in return address hijacking and unwinding.
  • Identify increased binary size for System.*.dll
  • Determine performance regressions using benchmarks such as OrchirdCMS.

Contributes to #109457

This PR adds support for Pointer Authentication (PAC) on Arm64. Pointer Authentication (PAC) is an Armv8.3+ security feature designed to mitigate Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) attacks by cryptographically signing return addresses. While using PAC, we store a signed return address, instead of the plain address, on the stack and later authenticate it before returning from a function. It ensures control flow returns to the intended caller.

More details on PAC and its role in software security can be found ([here](https://llsoftsec.github.io/llsoftsecbook/#sec:pointer-authentication)).

- The current implementation of PAC is turned off by default, but can be turned on by setting DOTNET_JitPacEnabled=1.
- PAC protects link register (LR) by signing it in the prolog (using `paciasp`) before it is split, using the current SP as the modifier. It then authenticates the LR in the epilog (using `autiasp`) before the function returns. If the signature is invalid, the execution fails with `SIGILL`.
- - When the runtime needs to read or overwrite a return address during hijacking for GC, it now strips the PAC (using `xpaclri`) and re-signs the new target address before storing it back.
- To simply tracking the SP in return address hijacking, we avoid using the pre-indexed variant of storing FP/LR on stack (e.g., `stp fp,lr,[sp,-#framesz]! `) to simply tracking the SP in return address hijacking. We obtain the value of SP at the time of signing the LR from the location of the current FP.  We can't use this approach when the pre-indexed `stp` is used because we don't know the`#framesz`.
- The updated prolog/epilog sequences generated by the JIT now look like:

 // Prolog
 sub     sp, sp, #framesz
 paciasp                 ; sign LR with A-key + SP
 stp     fp, lr, [sp]

 // Epilog
 ldp     fp, lr, [sp]
 autiasp                 ; authenticate LR
 add     sp, sp, #framesz
 ret

ToDos:
[] Restore the original frame layout that used pre-indexed variant of `stp` to store FP/LR.
[] Authenticate the return address instead of stripping in return address hijacking and unwinding.
[] Identify increased binary size for System.*.dll
[] Determine performance regressions using benchmarks such as OrchirdCMS.
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service Bot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Mar 11, 2026
@jkotas jkotas added area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI arch-arm64 and removed area-NativeAOT-coreclr labels Mar 11, 2026
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

jkotas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
This PR covers subset of PAL-RET changes from #125436 related to the coreclr and
VM.

More details on PAC and its role in software security can be found
([here](https://llsoftsec.github.io/llsoftsecbook/#sec:pointer-authentication)).

The feature is disabled by default so CI status of this PR won't reflect
the impact of changes.
Comment thread src/coreclr/inc/daccess.h Outdated
typedef DPTR(TADDR) PTR_TADDR;

#ifndef NATIVEAOT
#if defined(NATIVEAOT) && defined(TARGET_ARM64)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How many places are these types used at? What would it take to fix the sources to use PTR_uint32_t insrtead PTR_DWORD, etc. defined above to avoid dealing with the Windows types mess?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These typedefs were used from unwinder.cpp and clrnt.h. I’ve updated those paths to use the fixed-width PTR_uint32_t / PTR_uint64_t style aliases NativeAOT.

Apologies for spamming the CI 🙈 . I underestimated how many platform-specific type differences this would expose. Without access to the failing configurations, had to test it in the CI.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SwapnilGaikwad SwapnilGaikwad Jun 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems the failures for CDAC on x64 are because it builds dotnet/diagnostics repo that contains older crosscomp.h where the defs for CONTEXT_UNWOUND_TO_CALL are not guarded for ifndefs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@SwapnilGaikwad SwapnilGaikwad Jun 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll create a PR to sync changes from #127161 to the diagnostics repo. Unfortunately it will be next week as we need to sort out setting up the diagnostics repo for an internal review before creating the PR.
I'll move the new changes to the NativeAOT PR so the review can begin. The Pri0 failures for ElidedBoundsChecks test seems unrelated to the PR.
Probably, only failure to investigate are on runtime-diagnostics (CdacDumpTests windows-arm64 release) pipeline.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants