Skip to content

docs: research DPDK packet-path tradeoffs#123

Merged
div0rce merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/m48-dpdk-research-prototype
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

docs: research DPDK packet-path tradeoffs#123
div0rce merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/m48-dpdk-research-prototype

Conversation

@div0rce

@div0rce div0rce commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add docs/dpdk_research.md to separate DPDK packet-path research from measured kernel-socket evidence.
  • Add non-mutating make dpdk-check / scripts/dpdk_environment_check.sh support check.
  • Record results/dpdk_environment.txt as an unsupported-host macOS artifact with source-digest provenance and Dirty inputs: no.
  • Update README, Linux/socket docs, results policy, and project memory command lists for the new check.

Definition of Done

  • Research distinguishes what was measured from what was only studied.
  • Prototype is optional and only if environment support exists.
  • Docs explain why this remains late-stage research rather than core project evidence.
  • make check passes; PROGRESS.md updated.

Tests / Validation

  • bash -n scripts/dpdk_environment_check.sh
  • make dpdk-check
  • git diff --check main...HEAD
  • make check (232/232 native macOS)
  • CodeScene pre-commit safeguard: passed
  • CodeScene change-set analysis against main: passed

Evidence

results/dpdk_environment.txt reports:

  • Evidence class: unsupported-host
  • Device binding performed: no
  • Hugepage setup performed: no
  • Packet-path benchmark ran: no
  • Prototype compiled: no
  • Source digest: sha256:b2d79e329b8274dfa478e5226426af4a379c54e3d6def042dc448609af1cfa53
  • Dirty inputs: no

Limitations

  • No DPDK packet-path benchmark is claimed.
  • No kernel-bypass latency, throughput, or speedup claim is made.
  • The current development host is macOS, so M48 records research and environment gating only.
  • A DPDK prototype remains optional and should only be added on a host with suitable Linux, DPDK development files, hugepages, and intentionally managed device binding.

Review Notes

A bounded local codex review --base main attempt reached its 120-second alarm after starting internal CodeScene analysis and produced no final findings. Repository CodeScene gates completed separately and passed.

codescene-delta-analysis[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@codescene-delta-analysis codescene-delta-analysis Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No application code in the PR — skipped Code Health checks.

See analysis details in CodeScene

Quality Gate Profile: Pay Down Tech Debt
Install CodeScene MCP: safeguard and uplift AI-generated code. Catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@div0rce, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 11 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c84eebfb-4845-4ae0-b131-e4688ae28ac0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 548cb68 and b86c6bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • AGENTS.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • MILESTONES.md
  • Makefile
  • PROGRESS.md
  • README.md
  • docs/dpdk_research.md
  • docs/linux_performance.md
  • docs/socket_profiling.md
  • results/README.md
  • results/dpdk_environment.txt
  • scripts/dpdk_environment_check.sh
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/m48-dpdk-research-prototype

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@div0rce div0rce merged commit c643b62 into main Jun 15, 2026
8 checks passed
@div0rce div0rce deleted the feat/m48-dpdk-research-prototype branch June 15, 2026 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant