docs: reconcile MCP-first directive with HANDOFF and server naming#121
Conversation
Address PR #120 review: - HANDOFF.md said 'use GitHub CLI over GitHub MCP', contradicting the new MCP-first directive (and resume reads HANDOFF after CLAUDE/AGENTS). Flip HANDOFF to one canonical workflow: prefer the GitHub MCP for PR/issue/branch/commit/milestone review, gh CLI as fallback when the MCP is unavailable or for scripted steps; likewise prefer context7 for current docs over memory. - The directive named 'sequential-thinking' (hyphen) while the roster and HANDOFF use 'sequential_thinking' (underscore); standardize on the configured underscore name in CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md so no line points at an unconfigured server name.
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 43 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No application code in the PR — skipped Code Health checks.
See analysis details in CodeScene
Quality Gate Profile: Pay Down Tech Debt
Install CodeScene MCP: safeguard and uplift AI-generated code. Catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.
1 participant
Summary
Re-lands the reconciliation that missed the #120 squash-merge. PR #120 was squash-merged at
6ece05awhile its branch was still at the original commit, so the follow-up fix commit (b2bbcdb) addressing the review never reachedmain. As a result, the two Codex P2 issues raised on #120 are currently live on main. This PR cherry-picks that exact delta onto current main.Fixes (both flagged on #120, still present on main)
HANDOFF.md:738said "Use GitHub CLI over GitHub MCP", contradicting the new MCP-first directive (and resume reads HANDOFF after CLAUDE/AGENTS). HANDOFF now defers to the canonical MCP policy: prefer the GitHub MCP for PR/issue/branch/commit/milestone review, withghas the fallback when the MCP is unavailable or for scripted steps; the adjacent docs line preferscontext7over memory.sequential-thinking(hyphen) while the roster and HANDOFF usesequential_thinking(underscore), undercutting the "never invent a server" rule. Standardized to the underscore form in CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md.Definition of Done
sequential_thinkingused consistently; no hyphenated straggler in CLAUDE/AGENTS/HANDOFFanalyze_change_setclean (no scored files)Note
Verified against
origin/main@6ece05a: HANDOFF:738 still had the conflict line and CLAUDE/AGENTS:181 still had the hyphen before this PR.