Skip to content

Extend docs#1041

Merged
spoorcc merged 2 commits intomainfrom
extend-docs
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

Extend docs#1041
spoorcc merged 2 commits intomainfrom
extend-docs

Conversation

@spoorcc
Copy link
Contributor

@spoorcc spoorcc commented Mar 9, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added example manifest section with sample YAML configuration demonstrating remotes, projects, and attributes
    • Included reference links to real-world project implementations

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Walkthrough

README.md and doc/vendoring.rst updated with documentation examples. README.md adds a new "Example manifest" section containing a YAML manifest structure demonstration. doc/vendoring.rst adds two new real-world project references (Example Yocto and Example Zephyr).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Examples
README.md
Added new "Example manifest" section with YAML manifest example demonstrating remotes, projects, and various attributes structure.
Real World Projects
doc/vendoring.rst
Added two new example project links (Example Yocto and Example Zephyr) to the "Real world projects using Dfetch" section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Extend docs' is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term that doesn't convey specific information about which documentation was extended or what content was added. Consider using a more specific title like 'Add manifest example and project links to docs' to clearly indicate the specific documentation additions made in this changeset.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch extend-docs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 73-76: The README example uses an unsupported top-level
"manifest:" key; update the YAML snippet so "version", "remotes", and "projects"
are top-level entries (remove the "manifest:" wrapper) to match the schema
expected by dfetch/manifest/manifest.py (which requires version, remotes,
projects at top level), and ensure all subsequent indented blocks (remotes and
projects entries like the github/sourceforge entries and project blocks such as
cpputest-git-tag and tortoise-svn-branch-rev) are re-indented as shown in the
suggested doc fix.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c83e018a-2951-4936-9e64-c097bdf97d6b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44290f0 and 4911aea.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • doc/vendoring.rst

@spoorcc spoorcc merged commit 9068ab9 into main Mar 9, 2026
17 of 36 checks passed
@spoorcc spoorcc deleted the extend-docs branch March 9, 2026 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant