Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions docs/source/user_guide/benchmarks/amorphous_materials.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
===================
Amorphous materials
===================

Amorphous carbon melt-quench
============================

Summary
-------

Assess the ability of models to reproduce amorphous carbon structure by running
melt-quench simulations at fixed density and measuring the sp3 fraction. Results are
compared against DFT and experimental reference curves from the literature. [#dft]_ [#expt]_
The DFT reference uses spin-paired DFT within the local density approximation (LDA). [#dft]_

Metrics
-------

1. MAE vs DFT

Mean absolute error in sp3 fraction relative to the DFT reference curve.

2. MAE vs Expt

Mean absolute error in sp3 fraction relative to the experimental reference curve.

Computational cost
------------------

High: melt-quench MD runs for each model and density grid point.

Data availability
-----------------

Reference DFT and experimental datasets are stored with the benchmark analysis files
and taken from published curves. [#dft]_ [#expt]_

References
----------

.. [#dft] Jana *et al.* (2019), Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 27 085009.
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651X/ab45da

.. [#expt] Deringer & Csányi (2017), Phys. Rev. B 95, 094203.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094203
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions docs/source/user_guide/benchmarks/index.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ Benchmarks
molecular_crystal
molecular
bulk_crystal
amorphous_materials
Loading