Skip to content

SD-2837-updated iss and surr prompts#468

Open
palatsangeetha wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
SD-2837
Open

SD-2837-updated iss and surr prompts#468
palatsangeetha wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
SD-2837

Conversation

@palatsangeetha
Copy link
Collaborator

@palatsangeetha palatsangeetha commented Feb 4, 2026

PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Enhanced issuance prompt with detailed workflow steps and API endpoints

  • Clarified surrender response process with explicit POST request details

  • Improved formatting with bold text and structured sections

  • Added missing newline at end of platform PSP file


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Issuance/Surrender<br/>Prompts"] -->|Enhanced with| B["API Endpoint<br/>Details"]
  A -->|Improved| C["Structured<br/>Formatting"]
  A -->|Clarified| D["Response<br/>Workflows"]
  B --> E["POST/PUT<br/>Requests"]
  D --> F["Step-by-step<br/>Instructions"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
prompt-iss-reqres-ebltype.md
Restructured issuance prompt with workflow details             

ebl-issuance/src/main/resources/standards/eblissuance/instructions/prompt-iss-reqres-ebltype.md

  • Restructured prompt with "What Happens" and "Next Steps" sections
  • Added detailed workflow steps showing PUT request to
    /ebl-issuance-requests and automatic POST response
  • Enhanced formatting with bold text for key variables and action
    buttons
  • Clarified conformance validation and response processing steps
+13/-5   
prompt-platform-psp.md
Clarified platform response endpoint details                         

ebl-issuance/src/main/resources/standards/eblissuance/instructions/prompt-platform-psp.md

  • Clarified that asynchronous response is sent via POST request to
    /ebl-issuance-responses
  • Added missing newline at end of file for proper formatting
+2/-2     
prompt-surrender-reqres.md
Added surrender response endpoint specification                   

ebl-surrender/src/main/resources/standards/eblsurrender/instructions/prompt-surrender-reqres.md

  • Specified that synthetic carrier response is made via POST request to
    /ebl-surrender-responses
  • Enhanced clarity on the automatic response mechanism
+2/-1     
prompt-surrender-ssp.md
Specified surrender response endpoint requirement               

ebl-surrender/src/main/resources/standards/eblsurrender/instructions/prompt-surrender-ssp.md

  • Clarified that system response should be sent via POST request to
    /ebl-surrender-responses
  • Added missing newline at end of file for proper formatting
+3/-2     

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🟡
🎫 #SD-2837
🟢 Update/Correct the issuance conformance prompt text so it accurately describes the
request/response workflow and participant actions.
Update/Correct the surrender conformance prompt text so it accurately describes the
request/response workflow and participant actions.
Ensure the prompts reference the correct API endpoints and HTTP methods used in the
conformance flows.
Improve prompt clarity/formatting to reduce ambiguity for users following the conformance
steps.
Confirm the documented endpoints/methods and described “automatic/asynchronous” behavior
precisely match the actual conformance platform behavior in runtime (end-to-end scenario
execution).
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Replace vague placeholder with specific actions

In the surrender instructions, replace the vague placeholder RESPONSE with
the more specific and contextually appropriate actions "accept or reject".

ebl-surrender/src/main/resources/standards/eblsurrender/instructions/prompt-surrender-ssp.md [12-13]

-2. Your system should automatically **RESPONSE** the surrender request by making a POST request to
+2. Your system should automatically **accept or reject** the surrender request by making a POST request to
    `/ebl-surrender-responses`
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: This suggestion correctly identifies and fixes a vague placeholder **RESPONSE** left in the PR. Replacing it with "accept or reject" aligns with the terminology used in another file (prompt-surrender-reqres.md), improving both clarity and consistency.

Medium
Clarify synchronous vs. asynchronous responses

Clarify the workflow by explicitly distinguishing between the synchronous
acknowledgement from the PUT request and the subsequent asynchronous POST
response. This will help users better understand the sequence of events.

ebl-issuance/src/main/resources/standards/eblissuance/instructions/prompt-iss-reqres-ebltype.md [6-10]

-1. **Your carrier sends**: PUT request to `/ebl-issuance-requests` with the issuance request details
-2. **Synthetic platform responds**: Automatically sends an issuance response by making a POST request to
-   `/ebl-issuance-responses` with response code **RESPONSE_CODE**
-3. **Conformance validates**: Your carrier's request conforms to the DCSA eBL Issuance API standard
-4. **Your Carrier**: Process the automatic response from the synthetic platform
+1. **Your carrier sends**: PUT request to `/ebl-issuance-requests` with the issuance request details. The synthetic platform will provide a synchronous acknowledgement.
+2. **Synthetic platform responds asynchronously**: The platform automatically sends an issuance response by making a POST request to your `/ebl-issuance-responses` endpoint with response code **RESPONSE_CODE**.
+3. **Conformance validates**: Your carrier's request conforms to the DCSA eBL Issuance API standard.
+4. **Your Carrier**: Process the asynchronous response received from the synthetic platform.
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the distinction between the synchronous PUT response and the asynchronous POST response is unclear in the PR's text. Improving this distinction enhances the clarity of the instructions for the user.

Low
Remove unintended line break

In the source markdown, merge the sentence currently split across two lines into
a single line to improve readability and prevent potential formatting issues.

ebl-issuance/src/main/resources/standards/eblissuance/instructions/prompt-iss-reqres-ebltype.md [1-2]

-Send an issuance request for an eBL of type **EBL_TYPE** to the platform that has not yet been issued to get response
-code **RESPONSE_CODE**.
+Send an issuance request for an eBL of type **EBL_TYPE** to the platform that has not yet been issued to get response code **RESPONSE_CODE**.
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

__

Why: The suggestion correctly points out that the sentence split across two lines will render as a single line in Markdown due to the lack of a blank line or double spaces. While the proposed change improves source code readability, it does not alter the final rendered output.

Low
  • More

Copy link
Collaborator

@HenrikHL HenrikHL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants