forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
backport: Merge bitcoin#30257, 30264, 29607 , 30047, 3006, 27905 #7296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
vijaydasmp
wants to merge
6
commits into
dashpay:develop
Choose a base branch
from
vijaydasmp:May_2026_03
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7dd50a3
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30257: build: Remove --enable-gprof
fanquake 2d93ab8
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30264: test: add coverage for errors for `combi…
fanquake 804d22a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29607: refactor: Reduce memory copying operatio…
achow101 621289f
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30047: refactor: Model the bech32 charlimit as …
achow101 6c0a307
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30006: test: use sleepy wait-for-log in reindex…
achow101 13d8299
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27905: validation: add missing insert to m_dirt…
fanquake File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 Suggestion: Cherry-pick order of bitcoin#29607 and bitcoin#30047 is reversed — breaks git bisect
Upstream merged bitcoin#30047 (charlimit enum / CHECKSUM_SIZE constexpr) before bitcoin#29607 (encode-path memcopy reduction), and bitcoin#29607 explicitly builds on bitcoin#30047. This PR applies them in the opposite order: 804d22a (Merge bitcoin#29607) lands before 621289f (Merge bitcoin#30047). At 804d22a, src/bech32.cpp:189 reads
ret.reserve(hrp.size() + 1 + values.size() + CHECKSUM_SIZE);butconstexpr size_t CHECKSUM_SIZE = 6;is not introduced until the next merge. Verified:git show 804d22a487:src/bech32.cppreferences CHECKSUM_SIZE, while neither 804d22a~1 nor 804d22a itself defines it. That intermediate commit will not compile, which breaksgit bisectacross this range. The final HEAD (13d8299) is correct because bitcoin#30047 is applied immediately after, so this is non-blocking — but the merges should be reordered to match upstream and preserve bisectability.source: ['claude', 'codex']