write code in xmap with kimi-k2-0711-preview#9
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.55% 99.55%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1114 1118 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 1109 1113 +4
Misses 3 3
Partials 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
AI did a good job on this kind of codes
But kimi-k2-0711-preview made a mistake is that map in golang is unorderd
so the testing function generated will not pass
Tips for getting started:
⏺ I'll implement the MapKeys function and add tests for it. Let me start by examining the existing code to understand the pattern used in MapValues.
⏺ Read(pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go)
⎿ Read 75 lines (ctrl+r to expand)
⏺ Now let me look at the test file to understand the testing pattern:
⏺ Read(pkg/xmap/xmap_test.go)
⎿ Read 114 lines (ctrl+r to expand)
⏺ Now I'll implement the MapKeys function based on the existing MapValues pattern, and add tests for it.
⏺ Update(pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go)
╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit file │
│ ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ │
│ │ pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 72 func MapValues[K comparable, V1, V2 any](in map[K]V1, fn func(K, V1) V2) │ │
⏺ Update(pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go)
╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ Edit file │
│ ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ │
│ │ pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 72 func MapValues[K comparable, V1, V2 any](in map[K]V1, fn func(K, V1) V2) map[K]V2 { │ │
⏺ Update(pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go)
⎿ Updated pkg/xmap/xmap_common.go with 24 additions
72 func MapValues[K comparable, V1, V2 any](in map[K]V1, fn func(K, V1) V2) map[K]V2 {
73 return xiter.ToMap(xiter.Map2(func(k K, v V1) (K, V2) { return k, fn(k, v) }, xiter.FromMapKeyAndValues(in)))
74 }
75 +
76 + // MapKeys transforms the keys of a map using the provided function while keeping values unchanged.
77 + // This is useful for transforming data structures while preserving the value associations.
78 + //
79 + // Parameters:
80 + //
81 + // in map[K]V1: The input map to transform
82 + // fn func(K, V1) K: A function that takes a key and its corresponding value, and returns a new key
83 + //
84 + // Returns:
85 + //
86 + // map[K]V1: A new map with the same values as the input map but with transformed keys
87 + //
88 + // Example:
89 + //
90 + // m := map[string]int{"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3}
91 + // fn := func(k string, v int) string {
92 + // return k + "_key"
93 + // }
94 + // result := MapKeys(m, fn)
95 + // // result will be map[string]int{"a_key": 1, "b_key": 2, "c_key": 3}
96 + func MapKeys[K comparable, V1 any](in map[K]V1, fn func(K, V1) K) map[K]V1 {
97 + return xiter.ToMap(xiter.Map2(func(k K, v V1) (K, V1) { return fn(k, v), v }, xiter.FromMapKeyAndValues(in)))
98 + }
⏺ Now I'll add tests for the new MapKeys function:
⏺ Update(pkg/xmap/xmap_test.go)
⎿ User rejected update to pkg/xmap/xmap_test.go
110 emptyResult := xmap.MapValues(emptyMap, fn)
111 assert.Equal(t, map[string]string{}, emptyResult)
112 })
113 +
114 + t.Run("map keys", func(t *testing.T) {
115 + m := map[string]int{"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3}
116 + fn := func(k string, v int) string {
117 + return k + "key"
118 + }
119 + var result = xmap.MapKeys(m, fn)
120 + expected := map[string]int{"a_key": 1, "b_key": 2, "c_key": 3}
121 + assert.Equal(t, expected, result)
122 +
123 + // Test with value usage in transformation
124 + fnWithValue := func(k string, v int) string {
125 + return fmt.Sprintf("%s%d", k, v)
126 + }
127 + resultWithValue := xmap.MapKeys(m, fnWithValue)
128 + expectedWithValue := map[string]int{"a_1": 1, "b_2": 2, "c_3": 3}
129 + assert.Equal(t, expectedWithValue, resultWithValue)
130 +
131 + // Test with empty map
132 + emptyMap := map[string]int{}
133 + emptyResult := xmap.MapKeys(emptyMap, fn)
134 + assert.Equal(t, map[string]int{}, emptyResult)
135 +
136 + // Test with duplicate key generation (last one wins)
137 + m2 := map[int]string{1: "a", 2: "b", 3: "c"}
138 + fn2 := func(k int, v string) int {
139 + return k % 2 // This will create duplicate keys: 1%2=1, 2%2=0, 3%2=1
140 + }
141 + result2 := xmap.MapKeys(m2, fn2)
142 + // Should have keys 0 and 1, with values from the last occurrence of each key
143 + expected2 := map[int]string{0: "b", 1: "c"}
144 + assert.Equal(t, expected2, result2)
145 + })
146 }