Skip to content

Process results in series#1843

Merged
nfahlgren merged 23 commits intov5.0from
process-results-in-series
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Process results in series#1843
nfahlgren merged 23 commits intov5.0from
process-results-in-series

Conversation

@joshqsumner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joshqsumner joshqsumner commented Nov 11, 2025

Describe your changes
Moved plantcv.parallel.process_results and plantcv.parallel.json2csv to the main plantcv.plantcv module.

Type of update
This is a feature enhancement/restructuring to allow for clearer use of outputs from jupyter notebooks/non-parallel workflows.

Associated issues
None (whoops), discussed talked about in dev meeting 10/3/2025 and a few times in passing since then.

Additional context
Follows after removing the utils subpackage.

For the reviewer
See this page for instructions on how to review the pull request.

  • PR functionality reviewed in a Jupyter Notebook
  • All tests pass
  • Test coverage remains 100%
  • Documentation tested
  • New documentation pages added to plantcv/mkdocs.yml
  • Changes to function input/output signatures added to updating.md
  • Code reviewed
  • PR approved

@joshqsumner joshqsumner added work in progress Mark work in progress update Updates an existing feature/method merge in order Set of PRs that need to be merged sequentially labels Nov 11, 2025
@deepsource-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

deepsource-io Bot commented Nov 11, 2025

DeepSource Code Review

DeepSource reviewed changes in the commit range 49b3f70...b88334a on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as review comments.

For detailed review results, please see the PR on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Security × 0 issues Overall PR Quality   

Reliability × 0 issues
Complexity × 0 issues
Hygiene × 0 issues
Coverage × 0 issues

Code Review Summary

Analyzer Status Summary Details
Python No new issues detected. Review ↗
Test coverage No new issues detected. Review ↗
How are these analyzer statuses calculated?

Administrators can configure which issue categories are reported and cause analysis to be marked as failed when detected. This helps prevent bad and insecure code from being introduced in the codebase. If you're an administrator, you can modify this in the repository's settings.

Code Coverage Summary

Language Line Coverage Branch Coverage
New Code Overall New Code Overall
Aggregate
100%
[✓ above threshold]
100%
100%
100%
Python
100%
[✓ above threshold]
100%
100%
100%

➟ Additional coverage metrics may have been reported. See full coverage report ↗

@joshqsumner joshqsumner added ready to review and removed work in progress Mark work in progress labels Nov 11, 2025
@nfahlgren nfahlgren added this to the PlantCV v5.0 milestone Feb 19, 2026
@nfahlgren nfahlgren merged commit c5454ac into v5.0 Feb 19, 2026
5 checks passed
@nfahlgren nfahlgren deleted the process-results-in-series branch February 19, 2026 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merge in order Set of PRs that need to be merged sequentially ready to review update Updates an existing feature/method

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants