Skip to content

Conversation

@gmorales96
Copy link
Contributor

@gmorales96 gmorales96 commented Jun 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced support for retrieving and querying postal code information through a new resource.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to validate postal code retrieval functionality, including coverage for different postal code scenarios.
  • Chores
    • Updated dependency version for postal code validations.
    • Increased package version to 2.1.5 development release.

@gmorales96 gmorales96 requested a review from alexviquez as a code owner June 25, 2025 18:25
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

This change adds a new PostalCodes resource class to the codebase, defined in a new module postal_codes.py. The class supports retrieval and querying of postal code data with structured attributes and uses types from cuenca_validations. The PostalCodes resource is integrated into the package's resource management system and exposed via the public API in both cuenca/__init__.py and cuenca/resources/__init__.py. The package version is incremented from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5, and the cuenca-validations dependency is updated from version 2.1.5 to 2.1.8. New automated tests and corresponding HTTP interaction cassettes are added to validate the PostalCodes resource behavior with different postal code queries. Additionally, some test fixtures and user update tests were modified to use enum values instead of string literals for the profession field, and new verification ID fields were added to the user request fixture.

Suggested reviewers

  • rogelioLpz
  • felipao-mx
    """

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0177a23 and e72923c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • requirements.txt
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: lint

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1a2563d) to head (e72923c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #421   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           51        52    +1     
  Lines         1134      1151   +17     
=========================================
+ Hits          1134      1151   +17     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cuenca/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
cuenca/resources/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cuenca/resources/postal_codes.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cuenca/version.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a2563d...e72923c. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rogelioLpz rogelioLpz merged commit e4f5cd4 into main Jul 10, 2025
22 of 32 checks passed
@rogelioLpz rogelioLpz deleted the postal_codes branch July 10, 2025 00:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants