refactor: UI refactoring for organization and wallet flow.

[pranalidhanavade]

What

• Fixed: If no state and city then allow to create org - state and city should be mandatory if present else it could be optional and allow org creation
• Maintained consistency across create organization flow.

UI Screens

---

Important

Refactor UI for organization and wallet flows, making state and city fields optional, introducing new components, and improving consistency and readability.

• Behavior:
  • CreateOrganizationModal.tsx: State and city fields are now optional if not present, allowing organization creation without them.
  • Consistent organization creation flow with improved validation and error handling.
• Components:
  • Extracted LogoUploader component for handling organization logo uploads.
  • Introduced geoHelpers.ts for fetching countries, states, and cities.
  • Replaced select dropdowns with RadioGroup in DedicatedAgentLedgerConfig.tsx and LedgerConfig.tsx for network and method selection.
• Misc:
  • Updated WalletSpinupComponent.tsx to handle agent type selection and wallet spin-up process with improved state management.
  • Minor UI adjustments and code cleanup across multiple files.

^{This description was created by for e1129bc. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 99b53da in 1 minute and 45 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 585 lines of code in 4 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:213

• Draft comment:
  State and City fields are now marked as nullable in the validation schema. Ensure that backend validation is updated to handle optional values consistently.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is speculative - it assumes there might be backend validation issues without evidence. The frontend changes are well thought out and consistent. The comment is asking the author to "ensure" something about the backend, which violates our rule about not asking authors to verify/ensure things. We should trust that if backend changes were needed, they would be included in the PR. The comment does identify an important architectural consideration about frontend/backend consistency. Maybe there really are backend validation issues that need to be addressed? While backend validation consistency is important, speculative comments asking authors to "ensure" things are not helpful. If there were backend validation issues, they should be raised with specific evidence, not speculation. Delete this comment. It violates our rule about not asking authors to verify/ensure things, and makes speculative assumptions about backend issues without evidence.

2. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:241

• Draft comment:
  Using a separate 'createLoading' state for create/update actions improves clarity over general loading. This separation is a good practice.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states that a practice is good without suggesting any changes or asking for confirmation on specific code behavior.

3. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:685

• Draft comment:
  The button 'disabled' prop now combines manual field checks (name, description, country, and optionally state/city). Verify that these conditions remain in sync with Formik's internal validation state.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the PR author to verify that the conditions remain in sync with Formik's internal validation state. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or to double-check things, which violates the rules.

4. nextjs/src/features/wallet/DedicatedAgentLedgerConfig.tsx:230

• Draft comment:
  Refactoring from a dropdown (Select) to a RadioGroup for network/method selection improves UI consistency. Confirm that the didMethod extraction logic matches the RadioGroup values.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

5. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:197

• Draft comment:
  The mapping in 'networkToDidMap' appears to assign networkOptions[network] to itself. If the key and value are identical, consider simplifying this mapping.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:525

• Draft comment:
  The controlled Field for 'Wallet Label' uses an external walletLabel state. Ensure that this manual control remains synchronized with Formik’s state to avoid discrepancies.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

7. nextjs/src/features/wallet/WalletSpinupComponent.tsx:43

• Draft comment:
  Some state setters (e.g. setCurrentOrgId, setIsShared, setShowProgressUI) are declared but their corresponding state values are not used. Consider removing them if they’re unnecessary.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

8. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:270

• Draft comment:
  Casting API responses to string (e.g. setFailure(resCreateOrg as string)) may hide meaningful error details. Consider extracting and displaying a proper error message from the response.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

9. nextjs/src/features/wallet/WalletSpinupComponent.tsx:285

• Draft comment:
  Socket event listeners are set up and cleaned up appropriately. Confirm that these listeners cover all necessary cases to provide robust feedback during the wallet spin-up process.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

10. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:645

• Draft comment:
  The new use of RadioGroup and Stepper components enhances UI consistency. Please test responsiveness across various screen sizes to ensure a smooth user experience.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_TxWfW2yvMlxcuDTO

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed da791d4 in 1 minute and 22 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 140 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:202

• Draft comment:
  Increased padding on the Network label (changed 'pb-2' to 'pb-6'). Confirm that this matches the design specs.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

2. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:250

• Draft comment:
  Updated padding on the Method label (changed 'pb-2' to 'pb-4') for improved spacing. Verify consistency with overall UI.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

3. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:265

• Draft comment:
  Added padding ('p-2.5') to each RadioGroup item in the method options. This enhances the clickable area. Confirm that this extra spacing is intentional.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

4. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:356

• Draft comment:
  Refactored the DID option selection to use a RadioGroup with RadioGroupItem components. This improves consistency. Verify that the state update (haveDidShared) works as expected.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

5. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:407

• Draft comment:
  Replaced native elements with the custom component for the Seed and DID fields. Ensure the Input component properly forwards props and refs.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

6. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:520

• Draft comment:
  Updated the wallet label field to use Field with as={Input} for consistency with other form elements. Confirm that form state remains in sync.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

7. nextjs/src/features/wallet/SetDomainValueInput.tsx:28

• Draft comment:
  Added bottom padding ('pb-4') to the flex container in the domain input label area for improved spacing. Confirm that this aligns with other form element spacings.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_5rhgjuiy7UNdvWCS

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed 0d28eed in 2 minutes and 16 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 221 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:444

• Draft comment:
  In the country select onValueChange handler, the fetched states from fetchStates(countryId) are not used to update the local state. Either capture and set the result or remove this call if the useEffect hook handles state updates.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

2. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:488

• Draft comment:
  In the state select onValueChange handler, the await fetchCities call isn’t used to update 'cities'. This is redundant since the useEffect with [selectedStateId, selectedCountryId] already handles updating cities.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_PTMOD9XQb5x3mkas

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed 070cf98 in 2 minutes and 0 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 211 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:389

• Draft comment:
  Redundant fetchStates call: The awaited call to fetchStates(countryId) is not used to update state. UseEffect already updates states based on selectedCountryId. Consider removing it.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

2. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/CreateOrganizationModal.tsx:432

• Draft comment:
  Redundant fetchCities call: The async call to fetchCities(selectedCountryId, stateId) isn’t used to update cities. The useEffect for [selectedStateId, selectedCountryId] already handles this. Consider removing this call.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

3. nextjs/src/features/organization/components/LogoUploader.tsx:61

• Draft comment:
  Simplify the onChange handler: Instead of using an inline arrow function, directly pass handleImageChange to onChange.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_IsXOCdVU2MmMLMn0

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed 79be3b4 in 1 minute and 5 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 27 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/organization/helper/geoHelpers.ts:31

• Draft comment:
  Returning an empty array on error may obscure API failures; consider propagating errors or handling failures more explicitly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The change appears intentional and consistent across the codebase. Returning empty arrays is a valid error handling strategy, especially for UI components that need to gracefully handle missing data. The error is logged which helps with debugging. The comment doesn't provide specific actionable alternatives. The comment raises a valid concern about error visibility. Silent failures could make debugging harder for API integration issues. The code already logs errors and follows a consistent pattern. The current approach allows UI to gracefully handle failures without complex error states. Delete the comment. While it raises a valid point, the current implementation is a reasonable design choice with error logging, and the comment doesn't provide specific enough guidance to be actionable.

Workflow ID: wflow_bBpt13UNVmsIdmWZ

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.6% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed e1129bc in 1 minute and 58 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 52 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. nextjs/src/features/wallet/DedicatedAgentLedgerConfig.tsx:517

• Draft comment:
  Style update: Replaced 'text-foreground' with 'text-muted-foreground' for the DID method display for design consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

2. nextjs/src/features/wallet/LedgerConfig.tsx:591

• Draft comment:
  Consistent styling: Added 'text-muted-foreground' to the DID method div for uniform look.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

3. nextjs/src/features/wallet/WalletSpinupComponent.tsx:562

• Draft comment:
  Header refactor: A new text indicator 'Step 3 of 4' is added, but the Stepper component still uses currentStep=2. Verify that the textual step and the Stepper's prop are intentionally different.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a real inconsistency in the UI that could confuse users. The step indicator shows "Step 3 of 4" but the Stepper component shows step 2 of 4. Since steps are 0-based in the Stepper (as seen elsewhere in the code), step 2 would actually be the third step, making this consistent. The comment is pointing out something that looks like an issue but actually isn't. I could be wrong about the 0-based indexing assumption. I should look for more evidence in the code about how steps are counted. Looking at the code more carefully, I see the Stepper is used consistently throughout the file with 0-based indexing. For example, on line 513 it shows "currentStep={4}" for what is clearly meant to be the final step. The comment should be deleted because it's pointing out a non-issue. The apparent inconsistency is due to the Stepper using 0-based indexing while the text uses 1-based indexing.

4. nextjs/src/features/wallet/WalletSpinupComponent.tsx:582

• Draft comment:
  Typo in hover scale class: 'hover:scale-102' is likely incorrect. Use the arbitrary value syntax (e.g., 'hover:scale-[1.02]') for proper scaling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_MYqNRtWkHI0fxtAD

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[sujitaw]

ok