-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 388
libcrun: check setenv failure #2007
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
eriksjolund
wants to merge
1
commit into
containers:main
Choose a base branch
from
eriksjolund:check-setenv-failure
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+11
−5
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
elsestatement is redundant and can be removed for clarity.More critically, the reuse of the
retvariable introduces a bug. Theset_home_envfunction now incorrectly returns 0 (success) when a user is not found in/etc/passwd. This happens becausefgetpwent_rsetsretto 0 on success, and if the user isn't found, the function proceeds to theerrorlabel whereret ? -errno : 0evaluates to 0.The original logic of returning
-1from theerrorlabel was correct for all failure cases, including 'user not found'. The new logicreturn ret ? -errno : 0;is flawed and should be reconsidered.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should be addressed,
retis used after theerrorlabel.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know why there is a ternary operator on line 1486 in the current main branch?
It seems
retcould never be0Here is code from the current main branch.
crun/src/libcrun/utils.c
Lines 1450 to 1487 in 0bc3050
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried another approach in
3d23abe
If you like it, I could switch to that.
(Untested code. I haven't run clang-format yet)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eriksjolund I like the approach of not reusing
retfor setenv checks.Yet in 3d23abe you also refactor the
set_home_env, which seems kind of out of scope for this PR. If you want to refactor it, please do so in a separate commit (so you can explain what's going on). Currently, your commit description says "check setenv failure" but you also do some other things, which is confusing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kolyshkin yes, I will need to create separate commits and PR.
To keep better order I created
set_home_env()has an unnecessary ternary operator #2010EINTRafterfgetpwent_r()failure missing #2009