Add first-principles concept overview with boundaries and critique#2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Define what each Outcome Graph concept uniquely explains, the boundary tests between neighboring concepts, the four-axis justification for each being a separate node kind, how the three relationship mechanisms (trace, reference, ambient context) differ, and a critical review of current gaps: missing strategy<->outcome edges, unpoliced job/opportunity boundary, over-broad outcome definition, evidence-free PRDs, the disconnected flywheel, and evidence having no home in the model. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VqW2peoqGiwcrVnkpagygB
Replace the 'defined too broadly' critique with the sharper defect: the outcome definition permits both lagging business results and influenceable behavior changes, while the outcome->opportunity structure only makes sense for product outcomes (Torres roots trees at product outcomes; Seiden separates outcome from impact). Rank three fixes: tighten to product outcome now, typed business/product outcomes with one level of nesting later, document-only advised against. Reflect the fault line in the outcome section, concept table, summary, and sources. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VqW2peoqGiwcrVnkpagygB
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Define what each Outcome Graph concept uniquely explains, the boundary
tests between neighboring concepts, the four-axis justification for each
being a separate node kind, how the three relationship mechanisms
(trace, reference, ambient context) differ, and a critical review of
current gaps: missing strategy<->outcome edges, unpoliced job/opportunity
boundary, over-broad outcome definition, evidence-free PRDs, the
disconnected flywheel, and evidence having no home in the model.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 noreply@anthropic.com
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VqW2peoqGiwcrVnkpagygB