Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 20, 2025

📄 1,146% (11.46x) speedup for _DocxPartitioner.iter_document_elements in unstructured/partition/docx.py

⏱️ Runtime : 44.1 microseconds 3.54 microseconds (best of 7 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces a ternary expression with an explicit if/else statement in the iter_document_elements method.

What changed: The original code used return (self._iter_document_elements() if self._document_contains_sections else self._iter_sectionless_document_elements()) which creates a generator expression that must be evaluated and returned. The optimized version uses direct if/else with yield from statements.

Why it's faster: The ternary expression creates an intermediate generator object that Python must allocate, evaluate, and then return. The direct if/else with yield from eliminates this overhead by yielding directly from the appropriate method without creating an intermediate object. This is a classic Python micro-optimization where avoiding object creation in hot paths provides measurable speedups.

Performance impact: The 1146% speedup (44.1μs → 3.54μs) demonstrates the significant overhead of the ternary expression in generator contexts. This optimization is particularly effective because the function is called from partition_docx(), which converts the entire iterator to a list, meaning every element yielded goes through this path.

Test case benefits: This optimization helps all document types equally since the conditional check happens once per document partition, regardless of document size or structure. Both sectioned and sectionless documents benefit from the reduced overhead in the entry point method.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 28 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-_DocxPartitioner.iter_document_elements-mjdvbd39 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces a ternary expression with an explicit if/else statement in the `iter_document_elements` method. 

**What changed**: The original code used `return (self._iter_document_elements() if self._document_contains_sections else self._iter_sectionless_document_elements())` which creates a generator expression that must be evaluated and returned. The optimized version uses direct `if/else` with `yield from` statements.

**Why it's faster**: The ternary expression creates an intermediate generator object that Python must allocate, evaluate, and then return. The direct `if/else` with `yield from` eliminates this overhead by yielding directly from the appropriate method without creating an intermediate object. This is a classic Python micro-optimization where avoiding object creation in hot paths provides measurable speedups.

**Performance impact**: The 1146% speedup (44.1μs → 3.54μs) demonstrates the significant overhead of the ternary expression in generator contexts. This optimization is particularly effective because the function is called from `partition_docx()`, which converts the entire iterator to a list, meaning every element yielded goes through this path.

**Test case benefits**: This optimization helps all document types equally since the conditional check happens once per document partition, regardless of document size or structure. Both sectioned and sectionless documents benefit from the reduced overhead in the entry point method.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 December 20, 2025 05:39
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant