⚡️ Speed up method OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_sections_update_pages_content by 12%
#1156
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 12% (0.12x) speedup for
OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_sections_update_pages_contentinbackend/python/app/sources/external/microsoft/one_note/one_note.py⏱️ Runtime :
499 microseconds→447 microseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves an 11% runtime improvement by eliminating unnecessary object instantiation when no query parameters are provided.
Key optimization: The original code unconditionally created
RequestConfiguration()objects for bothquery_paramsandconfig, even when no query parameters were specified. The optimized version uses lazy initialization - it only creates these objects when actually needed.Specific changes:
has_query_paramscheck usingany()to determine if query parameter objects are neededRequestConfiguration()objects when parameters are present or when headers/search require configurationPerformance impact: The line profiler shows the optimization is most effective for calls without query parameters - the common case where only
user_id,section_id, andpage_idare provided. In such scenarios, the code avoids creating two unnecessaryRequestConfigurationobjects, saving approximately 27% of the total execution time.Throughput remains stable at 745 ops/sec, indicating the optimization doesn't affect concurrent processing capabilities while reducing per-operation overhead.
This optimization particularly benefits workloads with frequent simple OneNote page updates that don't require complex query parameters, which appears to be a common pattern based on the test cases focusing on basic parameter scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_sections_update_pages_content-mjf6jtozand push.