Skip to content

Security: centrar/va-stack-privacy-layer

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Supported Versions

Version Supported
0.1.x

Security Considerations

Current Status: Demo/Proof of Concept

This project is currently a demonstration and not production-ready. The following security considerations apply:

⚠️ Known Limitations

  1. Simulated Privacy Methods

    • Local LLM processing is simulated (no actual inference)
    • Split learning is not implemented
    • TEE integration is not implemented
    • Differential privacy is not implemented
    • Impact: Privacy guarantees are conceptual only
  2. Watermark Privacy

    • Watermarks embed query hash and user fingerprint
    • Risk: If outputs are shared externally, metadata can be extracted
    • Mitigation: Watermarks are for internal tracking only
    • Recommendation: Add UI warning when watermarking is enabled
  3. Synthetic Substitution Quality

    • Regex-based entity extraction is fragile
    • Limited synthetic data pools (15 names, 8 orgs, 8 locations)
    • Risk: High false-positive/false-negative rates
    • Mitigation: Input validation limits data size
    • Recommendation: Integrate Microsoft Presidio for production
  4. Input Validation

    • Maximum request length: 10,000 characters
    • Maximum data length: 100,000 characters
    • No HTML/script sanitization (client-side only)
    • Risk: Potential XSS if server-side rendering is added
    • Mitigation: Static export prevents server-side execution
  5. No Rate Limiting

    • No throttling on API calls
    • Risk: Resource exhaustion, abuse
    • Mitigation: Client-side only (no backend to abuse)
    • Recommendation: Add rate limiting if backend is added

🔒 Security Best Practices

For Developers

  1. Never commit secrets

    • Use .env.local for local development
    • Add .env.local to .gitignore (already done)
    • Use environment variables for API keys
  2. Input validation

    • All user inputs are validated for length
    • Add additional validation if extending functionality
  3. Dependencies

    • Run npm audit regularly
    • Update dependencies promptly
    • Review security advisories
  4. Code review

    • All PRs require review
    • Security-sensitive changes require extra scrutiny

For Users

  1. Do not share watermarked outputs externally

    • Watermarks contain tracking metadata
    • Can be used to identify users and queries
  2. Understand privacy limitations

    • This is a demo, not production software
    • Privacy methods are simulated
    • Do not use for actual sensitive data
  3. Keep software updated

    • Update to latest version regularly
    • Review release notes for security fixes

🚨 Reporting a Vulnerability

If you discover a security vulnerability, please follow these steps:

  1. Do NOT open a public issue
  2. Email security details to: [your-security-email@example.com]
  3. Include:
    • Description of the vulnerability
    • Steps to reproduce
    • Potential impact
    • Suggested fix (if any)

We will respond within 48 hours and provide a timeline for fixes.

🛡️ Security Roadmap

Before Production Deployment

  • Integrate actual privacy methods

    • Local LLM (llama.cpp + GGUF)
    • Split learning backend
    • TEE support (AWS Nitro, Azure Confidential)
    • Differential privacy library (Google DP, OpenDP)
  • Enhance PII detection

    • Integrate Microsoft Presidio
    • Add custom entity recognizers
    • Improve accuracy to 95%+
  • Add security features

    • Rate limiting (10 req/min per user)
    • Input sanitization (HTML/script tags)
    • CSRF protection (if backend added)
    • Content Security Policy headers
  • Testing & Auditing

    • Comprehensive test suite (80%+ coverage)
    • Security audit by third party
    • Penetration testing
    • Compliance review (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.)
  • Monitoring & Logging

    • Security event logging
    • Anomaly detection
    • Audit trail for sensitive operations
    • Incident response plan

📋 Security Checklist

Before deploying to production, ensure:

  • All simulated methods replaced with real implementations
  • Third-party security audit completed
  • Penetration testing performed
  • Rate limiting implemented
  • Input sanitization comprehensive
  • Secrets management in place
  • Monitoring and alerting configured
  • Incident response plan documented
  • Compliance requirements met (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.)
  • User documentation includes security warnings
  • Privacy policy and terms of service published

🔐 Cryptographic Considerations

Watermarking

  • Uses zero-width Unicode characters (U+200B, U+200C)
  • Encodes: timestamp (48 bits) + level (3 bits) + hash (16 bits) + fingerprint (8 bits)
  • Not cryptographically secure - easily detectable and removable
  • Purpose: Internal tracking only, not security feature

Future Enhancements

For production, consider:

  • Cryptographic watermarking (e.g., spread spectrum)
  • Digital signatures for output verification
  • End-to-end encryption for sensitive data
  • Hardware security module (HSM) integration

📚 References


Last Updated: May 2026

Security Contact: [your-security-email@example.com]

There aren't any published security advisories