| Version | Supported |
|---|---|
| 0.1.x | ✅ |
This project is currently a demonstration and not production-ready. The following security considerations apply:
-
Simulated Privacy Methods
- Local LLM processing is simulated (no actual inference)
- Split learning is not implemented
- TEE integration is not implemented
- Differential privacy is not implemented
- Impact: Privacy guarantees are conceptual only
-
Watermark Privacy
- Watermarks embed query hash and user fingerprint
- Risk: If outputs are shared externally, metadata can be extracted
- Mitigation: Watermarks are for internal tracking only
- Recommendation: Add UI warning when watermarking is enabled
-
Synthetic Substitution Quality
- Regex-based entity extraction is fragile
- Limited synthetic data pools (15 names, 8 orgs, 8 locations)
- Risk: High false-positive/false-negative rates
- Mitigation: Input validation limits data size
- Recommendation: Integrate Microsoft Presidio for production
-
Input Validation
- Maximum request length: 10,000 characters
- Maximum data length: 100,000 characters
- No HTML/script sanitization (client-side only)
- Risk: Potential XSS if server-side rendering is added
- Mitigation: Static export prevents server-side execution
-
No Rate Limiting
- No throttling on API calls
- Risk: Resource exhaustion, abuse
- Mitigation: Client-side only (no backend to abuse)
- Recommendation: Add rate limiting if backend is added
-
Never commit secrets
- Use
.env.localfor local development - Add
.env.localto.gitignore(already done) - Use environment variables for API keys
- Use
-
Input validation
- All user inputs are validated for length
- Add additional validation if extending functionality
-
Dependencies
- Run
npm auditregularly - Update dependencies promptly
- Review security advisories
- Run
-
Code review
- All PRs require review
- Security-sensitive changes require extra scrutiny
-
Do not share watermarked outputs externally
- Watermarks contain tracking metadata
- Can be used to identify users and queries
-
Understand privacy limitations
- This is a demo, not production software
- Privacy methods are simulated
- Do not use for actual sensitive data
-
Keep software updated
- Update to latest version regularly
- Review release notes for security fixes
If you discover a security vulnerability, please follow these steps:
- Do NOT open a public issue
- Email security details to: [your-security-email@example.com]
- Include:
- Description of the vulnerability
- Steps to reproduce
- Potential impact
- Suggested fix (if any)
We will respond within 48 hours and provide a timeline for fixes.
-
Integrate actual privacy methods
- Local LLM (llama.cpp + GGUF)
- Split learning backend
- TEE support (AWS Nitro, Azure Confidential)
- Differential privacy library (Google DP, OpenDP)
-
Enhance PII detection
- Integrate Microsoft Presidio
- Add custom entity recognizers
- Improve accuracy to 95%+
-
Add security features
- Rate limiting (10 req/min per user)
- Input sanitization (HTML/script tags)
- CSRF protection (if backend added)
- Content Security Policy headers
-
Testing & Auditing
- Comprehensive test suite (80%+ coverage)
- Security audit by third party
- Penetration testing
- Compliance review (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.)
-
Monitoring & Logging
- Security event logging
- Anomaly detection
- Audit trail for sensitive operations
- Incident response plan
Before deploying to production, ensure:
- All simulated methods replaced with real implementations
- Third-party security audit completed
- Penetration testing performed
- Rate limiting implemented
- Input sanitization comprehensive
- Secrets management in place
- Monitoring and alerting configured
- Incident response plan documented
- Compliance requirements met (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.)
- User documentation includes security warnings
- Privacy policy and terms of service published
- Uses zero-width Unicode characters (U+200B, U+200C)
- Encodes: timestamp (48 bits) + level (3 bits) + hash (16 bits) + fingerprint (8 bits)
- Not cryptographically secure - easily detectable and removable
- Purpose: Internal tracking only, not security feature
For production, consider:
- Cryptographic watermarking (e.g., spread spectrum)
- Digital signatures for output verification
- End-to-end encryption for sensitive data
- Hardware security module (HSM) integration
- OWASP Top 10
- NIST Privacy Framework
- Microsoft Presidio
- Differential Privacy
- Trusted Execution Environments
Last Updated: May 2026
Security Contact: [your-security-email@example.com]