-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
Find degrees of freedom for non_central_f distribution
#1368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
JacobHass8
wants to merge
6
commits into
boostorg:develop
Choose a base branch
from
JacobHass8:nc-f-find-v1
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+215
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
44cbb53
Initial implementation/test of find_v1
JacobHass8 3eb7561
Added v2 finder
JacobHass8 4801654
Included edge cases for code coverage [ci skip]
JacobHass8 04eace4
Added checks for multiple degrees of freedom
JacobHass8 d43d08c
Improved test coverage
JacobHass8 ceb66f5
Merge branch 'boostorg:develop' into nc-f-find-v1
JacobHass8 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we be confident that
f(vLarge)is well-behaved? For many distributions computations fail for such extreme values. An alternative would be to use an asymptomatic expression similar to #1368 (comment).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the sparse testing I did here,
f(vLarge)only breaks forboost::math::real_concepttypes. That's not to say it's perfect otherwise.Does the asymptotic chi-squared distribution not involve
vLargewhich makes it more stable? That seems reasonable to me. I wonder if there is a similar expansion for dfn -> 0.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just asked the LLM of my choice to extend my script for the F distribution and it confirmed that the noncentral F asymptotically becomes a noncentral chi squared distribution. For the
v2case we getDetails
This should be more stable than choosing some arbitrary large value in my opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that should be way more stable. Good catch! I'll implement that and hopefully it will fix the
real_concepttype issues.