Skip to content

feat(da-indexer): add support for eigenda_v2 blobs retrieval via proxy#1566

Open
rimrakhimov wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
rimrakhimov/da-indexer/support-eigenda-proxy
Open

feat(da-indexer): add support for eigenda_v2 blobs retrieval via proxy#1566
rimrakhimov wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
rimrakhimov/da-indexer/support-eigenda-proxy

Conversation

@rimrakhimov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rimrakhimov rimrakhimov commented Nov 21, 2025

The PR adds a new endpoint which allows to retrieve blobs from eigenda V2 via 3-rd party eigenda-proxy. The service, accepts the eigenda commitments and try to retrieve corresponding blob through the proxy. If successful it stores that blob in the database, so that the next time the same commitment is requested, it can be retrieved from the local database (and, thus, definitely has the corresponding blob available)

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (2)
  • fix
  • feat

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rimrakhimov/da-indexer/support-eigenda-proxy

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bragov4ik bragov4ik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

had some pending comments I forgot about, might check again later 🙈

always() &&
(needs.test.result == 'success' || needs.test.result == 'cancelled') &&
(needs.lint.result == 'success' || needs.lint.result == 'cancelled')
uses: ./.github/workflows/_docker-build-push.yml
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it meant to be reverted as name suggests? 👀

Comment on lines +18 to +21
let initialized_settings = initialize_s3_storage_and_return_settings(test_name).await;
S3Storage::new(initialized_settings)
.await
.expect("cannot initialize s3 storage")
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: it seems that initialize_s3_storage_and_return_settings doesn't actually initialize the storage, as initialization happens right after;

maybe rename them? not sure how though :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants