bip52: Update to Closed#2165
Conversation
murchandamus
added
the
Metadata Update
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Concept ACK
Here are the relevant BIP 3 sections on this:
Closed
A BIP that is of historical interest only, and is not being actively worked on,
promoted or in active use, should be marked as Closed. The reason for moving the
proposal to (or from) Closed should be recorded in the Changelog section in the
same commit that updates the status.
Draft ↦ Closed
BIP authors may decide on their own to change their BIP’s status from Draft to Closed.
If a Draft BIP stops making progress, sees accumulated feedback unaddressed, or
otherwise appears stalled for a year, anyone may propose the BIP status be updated to
Closed. The BIP is then updated to Closed unless the authors assert that they intend to
continue work within four weeks of being contacted.
|
I have emailed Michael and Bogdan to provide them notice of this pull request. In absence of a response, this Status update may proceed after 2026-06-18.
Update: The email to the addresses in the BIP resulted in a delivery failure. I then emailed the Bitcoin Dev mailing list instead. |
|
Concept ACK! |
|
Concept ACK The domain powx.org seems to still be active. I took the liberty to send a message in their contact form:
|
|
Thanks @edilmedeiros! Good idea. |
murchandamus
force-pushed
the
bip52-closed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7172aed to
2d3cf30
Compare
|
I updated this PR to add the Changelog. |
This proposal appears abandoned, as it has not had any updates in over four years, and cursory search did not produce any public discussions of it since it was published either. Attempts to contact the authors did not receive a response within four weeks.
murchandamus
force-pushed
the
bip52-closed
branch
from
2d3cf30 to
4894bcc
Compare
danielabrozzoni
left a comment
danielabrozzoni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me! ACK 4894bcc
On an unrelated note, I didn't know that README.mediawiki had different background colors based on the status of the BIP! That's pretty cool, but apparently github doesn't display them :(
|
ACK 4894bcc |
|
Thanks, @danielabrozzoni, @edilmedeiros, and @jonatack |
4 participants
This proposal appears abandoned, as it has not had any updates in over four years, and cursory search did not produce any public discussions of it since it was published either.
cc: @pkvk