Switch to ruff

[sshugsc]

No description provided.

[mathieulemieux]

non-blocking, but it would have been nice to have the functional changes in a seperate commit than the formatting.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.38265% with 159 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.09%. Comparing base (1092e1f) to head (5b29d4f).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pori_python/ipr/annotate.py	43.63%	31 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/main.py	46.55%	31 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/connection.py	18.18%	27 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/inputs.py	84.21%	18 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/graphkb/util.py	86.02%	13 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/therapeutic_options.py	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/ipr.py	83.33%	11 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/graphkb/genes.py	94.20%	4 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/ipr/summary.py	95.34%	4 Missing ⚠️
pori_python/graphkb/match.py	94.73%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (77.38%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #100      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    83.06%   83.09%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files           18       18              
  Lines         2463     2466       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits          2046     2049       +3     
  Misses         417      417              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	83.09% <77.38%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.