Final_Submission#8
Conversation
Pressure Effects of Dimple-Like Ridges Batista, Nicholas 5/7/2015
Included presentation slides
|
We can't see Chart 1 nor the Figures on the nbviewer-rendered notebook. I am guessing you worked on a Windows machine, right? For each figure, I searched your source code for the figure caption to find the embed code, as follows: Figure 1: NACA0010-35 Symmetric Airfoil Figure 2: Modified Airfoil for Baseline Analysis Figure 3: Modified Foil & Spherical Dimples Chart 1: Dimple Size Chart Figure 4: Near-Wall Vortices Visualization Figure 5: XFLR5 Pressure/Force Visualization Figure 6: Coefficient of Pressure vs. Panel Location Figure 7: Streamlines around Modified Airfoil Figure 8: Pressure Contour Plot Then in your repo, we see these file names in folder /resources_foils/pictures Notice the difference? The extension of these files is upper case. Well, Windows is not case-sensitive, so it is able to find the files and display them (so is Mac OSX), but Linux is case-sensitive, and since nbviewer is on a Linux server, it is not finding your embedded images! I'm not sure what's the issue with the .gif files, though. I can see them in the GitHub rendered notebook, but not on the nbviewer. |
|
Please edit the name of the files so that the extension is lower case, and commit that change, if you can. |
Updated file names. Embedded video files as a possible alternative to .gif files that are un-viewable in nbviewer.
|
Hello Dr. Barba, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Lorena A. Barba notifications@github.com
|
|
For some reason, it didn't work. Oh well. (Also, the GIF animations worked fine before!) Applications for dimples include golf balls, helmets, bicycle helmets and automotive spoilers —> It would've been interesting to know some details of the flow regime in these cases (Reynolds number and perhaps the relative size of the dimples). Otherwise, it's not clear how the situation studied in this project relates to those applications. It looks like you are using the word "visualization" when you really mean "simulation." "These results indicate that dimpled roughness elements can induce pressure forces on an aerodynamic body." —>This is an obvious and superfluous statement! I really miss a conclusion that tells me what you learned from this exercise. What insights can be gained from this analysis? This report certainly does not give a clear idea of that. You have this bit of code in cell [58]: How do you figure that multiplying the sum of panel strengths by 100 will give you a percentage? A percentage of what? |
|
I was curious about the images and gifs issue, so I tried to open the notebook. I'm able to see all images and gif in github and NBviewer. I tried with Firefox and Chrome, and no problems. Besides, I'm using a linux machine. |
5/7/2015