fix: allocate lam_tmp before passing to solve_dirac_eigenproblem#25
Merged
Conversation
The crash was caused by passing an unallocated array (lam_tmp) to solve_dirac_eigenproblem in src/schroed_dirac_solver.f90 (around line 155). LFortran correctly detects this and raises a runtime error: “argument is unallocated”. This fix ensures lam_tmp is properly allocated before the call, preventing the runtime failure. The issue is in featom code and is not a bug in LFortran.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The crash was caused by passing an unallocated array (lam_tmp) to solve_dirac_eigenproblem in src/schroed_dirac_solver.f90 (around line 155).
LFortran correctly detects this and raises a runtime error: “argument is unallocated”.
This fix ensures lam_tmp is properly allocated before the call, preventing the runtime failure. The issue is in featom code and is not a bug in LFortran.