Fix and optimization for non-x86 architectures

[buu700]

Addresses #21. I wasn't sure based on that thread whether you'd prefer to remove sse4_crc32 entirely, or if we're keeping it then whether it should be above or below @node-rs/crc32, but I'm happy to make any changes you'd like before merging.

[Brooooooklyn]

Note, the @node-rs/crc32 can replace the sse4_crc32 completely, it use sse CPU instruction too, and faster than sse4_crc32, easier to install because it is without postinstall scripts and build dependencies.

[Brooooooklyn]

So I think the sse4_crc32 doesn't need any more, what do you think?

[buu700]

I didn't see a need for it either, personally. @node-rs/crc32 claims to be faster and seems to be more actively maintained, but it's up to @ashi009.

[madebymichaelg]

Hey @ashi009 👋, is there a chance we can get this merged? This is a blocker in my organization