feat(conformance): support optional request headers for registry probes#50
Open
yangbaechu wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat(conformance): support optional request headers for registry probes#50yangbaechu wants to merge 1 commit into
yangbaechu wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
evalstate
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a repeatable
--header "Name: value"option to the conformance CLI'sregistrycommand.This allows the existing Registry API probe to validate private or self-hosted registries that require request headers, such as an
Authorizationheader.Motivation
The current registry probe can validate public registries, but it cannot attach request headers. That makes it hard to run the conformance CLI against authenticated enterprise deployments.
This is motivated by #40, which describes a self-hosted Registry implementation with JWT-required, access-scoped search.
What Changed
--header "Name: value"arguments.GET /agentsPOST /searchPOST /exploreContent-Type: application/jsonfor POST probes.conformance/README.md.Scope
This is a conformance tooling change only; the Registry API security model is unchanged.
Example
ARD_REGISTRY_TOKEN=... ./conformance/bin/conformance-test registry https://registry.example.com/api/ard \ --header "Authorization: Bearer ${ARD_REGISTRY_TOKEN}"Validation
The invalid header command is expected to fail with a header format error.