fix the filter issue in find project filter sidebar #185
Conversation
|
Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the AJEET PRATAP SINGH's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request addresses a filter label selection bug by generating unique composite IDs for filter options and adds a Docker Compose configuration file defining PostgreSQL and API services for local development. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Mohan Dhila seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (2)
22-22: Consider usingdevelopmentfor NODE_ENV in docker-compose.Docker Compose is typically used for local development environments. Setting
NODE_ENV: productionmay disable helpful development features like verbose error messages and hot-reloading.- NODE_ENV: production + NODE_ENV: ${NODE_ENV:-development}
23-24: Add health check to ensure database readiness.The
depends_ondirective only ensures the postgres container starts before the api container, but doesn't wait for PostgreSQL to be ready to accept connections. This can cause the API to fail on startup.depends_on: - - postgres + postgres: + condition: service_healthyAlso add a health check to the postgres service:
postgres: image: postgres:15 environment: POSTGRES_USER: ${POSTGRES_USER:-opensox} POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${POSTGRES_PASSWORD:-opensox} POSTGRES_DB: ${POSTGRES_DB:-opensox} ports: - "5432:5432" volumes: - postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data + healthcheck: + test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U opensox"] + interval: 5s + timeout: 5s + retries: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/src/components/ui/Filter.tsx(1 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
apps/web/src/components/ui/Filter.tsx (2)
apps/web/src/components/ui/radio-group.tsx (1)
RadioGroupItem(44-44)apps/web/src/components/ui/label.tsx (1)
Label(26-26)
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
docker-compose.yml
[medium] 19-20: Basic Auth Credentials
(CKV_SECRET_4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/src/components/ui/Filter.tsx (1)
39-59: Excellent fix for the radio button selection bug!The implementation correctly addresses the issue by generating unique
inputIdvalues combiningfilterNameandfilter(e.g., "Popularity-Most Stars" vs "Competition-Most Stars"). This prevents ID collisions between filter groups that were causing labels in one group to inadvertently target radio buttons in another group.The fix ensures:
- Unique IDs for each filter option across all filter groups
- Proper
htmlForattribute linking labels to their corresponding radio buttons- Stable keys for React rendering
docker-compose.yml (1)
1-27: Clarify the connection between Docker Compose and the filter bug fix.This Docker Compose configuration appears unrelated to the filter sidebar bug fix described in the PR objectives (issue #184). The PR is focused on fixing a UI radio button selection issue, not adding Docker infrastructure.
Could you clarify why the Docker Compose configuration is included in this PR? Consider:
- Moving it to a separate PR if it's unrelated infrastructure setup
- Updating the PR description to explain the connection if these changes are related
docker-compose.yml
Outdated
| POSTGRES_USER: opensox | ||
| POSTGRES_PASSWORD: opensox | ||
| POSTGRES_DB: opensox |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Hardcoded database credentials.
The hardcoded credentials (opensox/opensox) are acceptable for local development but should never be used in production environments.
Consider documenting that these are development-only credentials or using environment variables for better flexibility:
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER: opensox
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD: opensox
- POSTGRES_DB: opensox
+ POSTGRES_USER: ${POSTGRES_USER:-opensox}
+ POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${POSTGRES_PASSWORD:-opensox}
+ POSTGRES_DB: ${POSTGRES_DB:-opensox}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| POSTGRES_USER: opensox | |
| POSTGRES_PASSWORD: opensox | |
| POSTGRES_DB: opensox | |
| environment: | |
| POSTGRES_USER: ${POSTGRES_USER:-opensox} | |
| POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${POSTGRES_PASSWORD:-opensox} | |
| POSTGRES_DB: ${POSTGRES_DB:-opensox} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docker-compose.yml around lines 6 to 8, the Postgres credentials are
hardcoded (POSTGRES_USER/POSTGRES_PASSWORD/POSTGRES_DB set to "opensox"), which
is insecure for production; change them to read from environment variables
(e.g., POSTGRES_USER: ${POSTGRES_USER:-opensox}) or document they are dev-only
and add a warning comment, and update README/deployment docs to instruct setting
secure credentials via env files or secrets for non-development deployments.
docker-compose.yml
Outdated
| DATABASE_URL: postgresql://opensox:opensox@postgres:5432/opensox?schema=public | ||
| JWT_SECRET: your-secret-key |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Hardcoded JWT secret in plain text.
The hardcoded JWT_SECRET: your-secret-key is a critical security issue. Secrets should never be committed to version control in plain text.
Based on static analysis hints.
Replace with an environment variable reference:
environment:
DATABASE_URL: postgresql://opensox:opensox@postgres:5432/opensox?schema=public
- JWT_SECRET: your-secret-key
+ JWT_SECRET: ${JWT_SECRET:?JWT_SECRET must be set}
PORT: 4000
NODE_ENV: productionAdd a .env.example file to document required environment variables:
# .env.example
JWT_SECRET=generate-a-secure-random-secret-here
POSTGRES_USER=opensox
POSTGRES_PASSWORD=opensox
POSTGRES_DB=opensox🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
[medium] 19-20: Basic Auth Credentials
(CKV_SECRET_4)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docker-compose.yml around lines 19 to 20, the JWT_SECRET is hardcoded as
plain text which is a security risk; update the compose file to reference an
environment variable (e.g., use ${JWT_SECRET}) instead of the literal string and
configure docker-compose to load secrets via an env_file or environment
variables supplied at runtime; additionally add a .env.example in the repo
listing required variables (JWT_SECRET, POSTGRES_USER, POSTGRES_PASSWORD,
POSTGRES_DB) with placeholder/example values and update documentation/README to
instruct maintainers to set a secure JWT_SECRET outside version control.
1 participant
Issues
This PR resolves the radio button selection conflict between filters.
Fixes #184
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores