Skip to content

NIFI-16018: Handle port number in header validator#11335

Closed
taz1988 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
taz1988:NIFI-16018
Closed

NIFI-16018: Handle port number in header validator#11335
taz1988 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
taz1988:NIFI-16018

Conversation

@taz1988

@taz1988 taz1988 commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

NIFI-16018

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-16018
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000
  • Pull request contains commits signed with a registered key indicating Verified status

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using ./mvnw clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21
    • JDK 25

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

@taz1988 taz1988 force-pushed the NIFI-16018 branch 5 times, most recently from 5d1641c to 7d79405 Compare June 12, 2026 23:22

@pvillard31 pvillard31 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rebase on main to make sure checks can run.

@taz1988 taz1988 force-pushed the NIFI-16018 branch 2 times, most recently from 240fbb3 to 8597403 Compare June 13, 2026 13:01

@pvillard31 pvillard31 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, will take care of the checkstyle violations while merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants