-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 913
Windows Terminal Support using WSL #9043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
matthiasblaesing
wants to merge
5
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
matthiasblaesing:terminal-support-wsl2
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+835
−1,031
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1c55778
dlight.nativeexecution: Support running with WSL instead of Cygwin
matthiasblaesing 088f55c
dlight.nativeexecution: Remove deprecated/removed API method - Solari…
matthiasblaesing 8aa7950
dlight.nativeexecution: Cleanup NetBeans warnings
matthiasblaesing 14b1d19
dlight.nativeexecution: Enable tests in CI/CD (mark tests needing rem…
matthiasblaesing 435a6e0
dlight.nativeexecution: If TERM is not set, indicate color is support…
matthiasblaesing File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like the migration to the new API happened in past already and this is all unused public API by now.
suggestion:
instead of suppressing deprecation warnings,
@Deprecate(already unused)newService(...)and the privateExecutionTaskclass. I believe this communicates a bit better what happened while also having the same effect of not generating javac warnings since a deprecated method may use other deprecated things.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The friend list of
dlight.nativeexecutionis awefully long. I don't intent to modify the API, so from my POV adding@Deprecatedis not correct as the APIs indlight.nativeexecutionare not deprecated.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the deprecation note was likely overlooked while implementing the split emilianbold/netbeans-releases@989e691#diff-995af13546863b00d18871524135eb30d93cbf6063e573f1aac795638012e292 since the parameters are deprecated.
Before I noticed that it wasn't used I added a second method and deprecated the first. This way API users are not forced to use deprecated classes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't want to change/modify/enhance the API. I'm willing to drop the
@SuppressWarningsannotations if you consider that more acceptable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok understood. The
@SuppressWarningsitself are probably fine - they don't make it worse at least ;). Its just an indication that there never was a followup on the unfinished API split (somewhat similar to #8940).